Radical 199 Caractères avec le radical 199 | Menu de navigationm

Radical chinois


blédictionnaire de Kangxi




Le radical 199, qui signifie le blé, est un des 6 des 214 radicaux chinois répertoriés dans le dictionnaire de Kangxi composés de onze traits.



Caractères avec le radical 199 |


























nombre de traitscaractères
Sans trait supplémentaire麥 麦
3 traits supplémentaires
4 traits supplémentaires麨 麩 麪 麫 麸
5 traits supplémentaires麬 麭 麮
6 traits supplémentaires麯 麰
7 traits supplémentaires麱 麲
8 traits supplémentaires麳 麴 麹 麺
9 traits supplémentaires
11 traits supplémentairess
18 traits supplémentaires



































  • Portail de l’écriture Portail de l’écriture

Popular posts from this blog

Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?How do we write a story about genocide committed by a fascist government without falling into the “Nazi Germany” cliché?Researching sensitive subjectsShould I avoid “lecturing” my readers?Archetypical/popular historical fictionHow to write a “strong” passage?Will what worked 'back then' work today? (Novels)Historical Fiction: using you and thouHow do you make characters relatable if they exist in a completely different moral context?How do I write a MODERN combat/violence scene without being dry?Fictionizing firsthand accounts from history?Is it possible to narrate a novel in a faux-historical style without alienating the reader?