What do the dots in this tr command do: tr …A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV” (with 13 dots)what is the benefit of --squeeze-repeats in tr commandWhy can't tr read from /dev/urandom on OSX?broken pipe error with popen and JS ffiIs the historical Unix V5 tr command padding behavior of set2 different from what we consider today “classic” System V (1983-1988) behavior?Heirloom Toolchest tr: error(s) trying to delete the complement of a set containing a multibyte character?how to substitute minus sign with trPulling IP address from ping command with sed?Why does tr -sc 'A-Za-z' '[12*]' includes empty line?I cannot understand what -c parameter does in tr command in Ubuntu GNU/Linux even though I read the manualStrange behaviour of tr using ranges
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
LWC SFDX source push error TypeError: LWC1009: decl.moveTo is not a function
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Is it possible to record a short contained sound no longer than 60 milliseconds?
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
tikz convert color string to hex value
What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record
Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?
Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
Today is the Center
Theorems that impeded progress
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr …A-Z A-ZA-Z
what is the benefit of --squeeze-repeats in tr commandWhy can't tr read from /dev/urandom on OSX?broken pipe error with popen and JS ffiIs the historical Unix V5 tr command padding behavior of set2 different from what we consider today “classic” System V (1983-1988) behavior?Heirloom Toolchest tr: error(s) trying to delete the complement of a set containing a multibyte character?how to substitute minus sign with trPulling IP address from ping command with sed?Why does tr -sc 'A-Za-z' '[12*]' includes empty line?I cannot understand what -c parameter does in tr command in Ubuntu GNU/Linux even though I read the manualStrange behaviour of tr using ranges
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I want to use tr
to do some rot13 transformation. I can beautifully understand this command:
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
which output is HELP ME PLEASE
, but I can't figure out how this other command can produce the same rot13 transformation:
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
So I have two questions:
- What's the magic behind the second
tr
command? - How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
tr
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to use tr
to do some rot13 transformation. I can beautifully understand this command:
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
which output is HELP ME PLEASE
, but I can't figure out how this other command can produce the same rot13 transformation:
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
So I have two questions:
- What's the magic behind the second
tr
command? - How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
tr
New contributor
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
1
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I want to use tr
to do some rot13 transformation. I can beautifully understand this command:
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
which output is HELP ME PLEASE
, but I can't figure out how this other command can produce the same rot13 transformation:
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
So I have two questions:
- What's the magic behind the second
tr
command? - How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
tr
New contributor
I want to use tr
to do some rot13 transformation. I can beautifully understand this command:
tr A-Za-z N-ZA-Mn-za-m <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
which output is HELP ME PLEASE
, but I can't figure out how this other command can produce the same rot13 transformation:
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "URYC ZR CYRNFR"
So I have two questions:
- What's the magic behind the second
tr
command? - How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
tr
tr
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Michael Homer
50.6k8140177
50.6k8140177
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Frederico OliveiraFrederico Oliveira
242
242
New contributor
New contributor
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
1
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago
add a comment |
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
1
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
1
1
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It works as follows:
SET1-> .............ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
SET2-> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
So tr
will translate SET1
to SET2
.
This is equivalent to first one because it is also shifting by 13
units as there 13 dots.
add a comment |
Ok, so thanks to @Prvt_Yadv I was able to understand the dots. Here's the first question answer:
What's the magic behind the second
tr
command?
The dots are replaced by a sequence of letters starting from a
to the number of dots. So
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z
will translate to tr A-MA-Z A-ZA-Z
In this case the sets are:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the beginning of both sets are identical until letter M
, this part is discarded becoming then
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the first set already contains all 26 letters and set2 has repeating trailing letter, those are discarded too, finally becoming
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
Which is the rot13 substitution and identical to the first command (except for not dealing with lower cases here). The same logic can be applied for the title of the question:
tr ...A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
would become tr A-CA-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
The sets being:
SET1 -> ABCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
Discarding the initial identical sequence and the trailing repeating letters they become:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABC
Which is the rot3 substitution.
Now for the second question:
How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
The dots are substituted by a sequence of letter of the same case as the next sequence. That means that tr .....A-Z
will translate to tr A-EA-Z
whereas tr .....a-z
will translate to tr a-ea-z
. But the dots only work before the literal sequence, not after. So the immediate solution idea tr .....A-Z.....a-z
won't work, because it will not translate to tr A-EA-Za-ea-z
. The only reliable way to make it work is to use two tr
commands as follow
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "ABJ V hqrefgnaq" | tr .............a-z a-za-z
Now it works for both upper and lower case :)
A caveat to using the dots substitution was gave by @iruvar: this command will not work as expected when the input stings has dots. So the following command won't print T.h.a.n.k.s.
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "G.u.n.a.x.f." | tr .............a-z a-za-z
It will print TMhMaMnMkMsM
instead, substituting the dots to M
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Frederico Oliveira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510838%2fwhat-do-the-dots-in-this-tr-command-do-tr-a-z-a-za-z-jvpqbov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It works as follows:
SET1-> .............ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
SET2-> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
So tr
will translate SET1
to SET2
.
This is equivalent to first one because it is also shifting by 13
units as there 13 dots.
add a comment |
It works as follows:
SET1-> .............ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
SET2-> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
So tr
will translate SET1
to SET2
.
This is equivalent to first one because it is also shifting by 13
units as there 13 dots.
add a comment |
It works as follows:
SET1-> .............ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
SET2-> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
So tr
will translate SET1
to SET2
.
This is equivalent to first one because it is also shifting by 13
units as there 13 dots.
It works as follows:
SET1-> .............ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
SET2-> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
So tr
will translate SET1
to SET2
.
This is equivalent to first one because it is also shifting by 13
units as there 13 dots.
answered 2 hours ago
Prvt_YadvPrvt_Yadv
3,08631329
3,08631329
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ok, so thanks to @Prvt_Yadv I was able to understand the dots. Here's the first question answer:
What's the magic behind the second
tr
command?
The dots are replaced by a sequence of letters starting from a
to the number of dots. So
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z
will translate to tr A-MA-Z A-ZA-Z
In this case the sets are:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the beginning of both sets are identical until letter M
, this part is discarded becoming then
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the first set already contains all 26 letters and set2 has repeating trailing letter, those are discarded too, finally becoming
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
Which is the rot13 substitution and identical to the first command (except for not dealing with lower cases here). The same logic can be applied for the title of the question:
tr ...A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
would become tr A-CA-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
The sets being:
SET1 -> ABCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
Discarding the initial identical sequence and the trailing repeating letters they become:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABC
Which is the rot3 substitution.
Now for the second question:
How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
The dots are substituted by a sequence of letter of the same case as the next sequence. That means that tr .....A-Z
will translate to tr A-EA-Z
whereas tr .....a-z
will translate to tr a-ea-z
. But the dots only work before the literal sequence, not after. So the immediate solution idea tr .....A-Z.....a-z
won't work, because it will not translate to tr A-EA-Za-ea-z
. The only reliable way to make it work is to use two tr
commands as follow
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "ABJ V hqrefgnaq" | tr .............a-z a-za-z
Now it works for both upper and lower case :)
A caveat to using the dots substitution was gave by @iruvar: this command will not work as expected when the input stings has dots. So the following command won't print T.h.a.n.k.s.
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "G.u.n.a.x.f." | tr .............a-z a-za-z
It will print TMhMaMnMkMsM
instead, substituting the dots to M
New contributor
add a comment |
Ok, so thanks to @Prvt_Yadv I was able to understand the dots. Here's the first question answer:
What's the magic behind the second
tr
command?
The dots are replaced by a sequence of letters starting from a
to the number of dots. So
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z
will translate to tr A-MA-Z A-ZA-Z
In this case the sets are:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the beginning of both sets are identical until letter M
, this part is discarded becoming then
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the first set already contains all 26 letters and set2 has repeating trailing letter, those are discarded too, finally becoming
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
Which is the rot13 substitution and identical to the first command (except for not dealing with lower cases here). The same logic can be applied for the title of the question:
tr ...A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
would become tr A-CA-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
The sets being:
SET1 -> ABCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
Discarding the initial identical sequence and the trailing repeating letters they become:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABC
Which is the rot3 substitution.
Now for the second question:
How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
The dots are substituted by a sequence of letter of the same case as the next sequence. That means that tr .....A-Z
will translate to tr A-EA-Z
whereas tr .....a-z
will translate to tr a-ea-z
. But the dots only work before the literal sequence, not after. So the immediate solution idea tr .....A-Z.....a-z
won't work, because it will not translate to tr A-EA-Za-ea-z
. The only reliable way to make it work is to use two tr
commands as follow
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "ABJ V hqrefgnaq" | tr .............a-z a-za-z
Now it works for both upper and lower case :)
A caveat to using the dots substitution was gave by @iruvar: this command will not work as expected when the input stings has dots. So the following command won't print T.h.a.n.k.s.
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "G.u.n.a.x.f." | tr .............a-z a-za-z
It will print TMhMaMnMkMsM
instead, substituting the dots to M
New contributor
add a comment |
Ok, so thanks to @Prvt_Yadv I was able to understand the dots. Here's the first question answer:
What's the magic behind the second
tr
command?
The dots are replaced by a sequence of letters starting from a
to the number of dots. So
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z
will translate to tr A-MA-Z A-ZA-Z
In this case the sets are:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the beginning of both sets are identical until letter M
, this part is discarded becoming then
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the first set already contains all 26 letters and set2 has repeating trailing letter, those are discarded too, finally becoming
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
Which is the rot13 substitution and identical to the first command (except for not dealing with lower cases here). The same logic can be applied for the title of the question:
tr ...A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
would become tr A-CA-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
The sets being:
SET1 -> ABCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
Discarding the initial identical sequence and the trailing repeating letters they become:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABC
Which is the rot3 substitution.
Now for the second question:
How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
The dots are substituted by a sequence of letter of the same case as the next sequence. That means that tr .....A-Z
will translate to tr A-EA-Z
whereas tr .....a-z
will translate to tr a-ea-z
. But the dots only work before the literal sequence, not after. So the immediate solution idea tr .....A-Z.....a-z
won't work, because it will not translate to tr A-EA-Za-ea-z
. The only reliable way to make it work is to use two tr
commands as follow
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "ABJ V hqrefgnaq" | tr .............a-z a-za-z
Now it works for both upper and lower case :)
A caveat to using the dots substitution was gave by @iruvar: this command will not work as expected when the input stings has dots. So the following command won't print T.h.a.n.k.s.
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "G.u.n.a.x.f." | tr .............a-z a-za-z
It will print TMhMaMnMkMsM
instead, substituting the dots to M
New contributor
Ok, so thanks to @Prvt_Yadv I was able to understand the dots. Here's the first question answer:
What's the magic behind the second
tr
command?
The dots are replaced by a sequence of letters starting from a
to the number of dots. So
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z
will translate to tr A-MA-Z A-ZA-Z
In this case the sets are:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the beginning of both sets are identical until letter M
, this part is discarded becoming then
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
But since the first set already contains all 26 letters and set2 has repeating trailing letter, those are discarded too, finally becoming
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> NOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
Which is the rot13 substitution and identical to the first command (except for not dealing with lower cases here). The same logic can be applied for the title of the question:
tr ...A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
would become tr A-CA-Z A-ZA-Z <<< “JVPQBOV”
The sets being:
SET1 -> ABCABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
Discarding the initial identical sequence and the trailing repeating letters they become:
SET1 -> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZ
SET2 -> DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVXWYZABC
Which is the rot3 substitution.
Now for the second question:
How to make the second command work for both lower and upper case, just like the first command?
The dots are substituted by a sequence of letter of the same case as the next sequence. That means that tr .....A-Z
will translate to tr A-EA-Z
whereas tr .....a-z
will translate to tr a-ea-z
. But the dots only work before the literal sequence, not after. So the immediate solution idea tr .....A-Z.....a-z
won't work, because it will not translate to tr A-EA-Za-ea-z
. The only reliable way to make it work is to use two tr
commands as follow
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "ABJ V hqrefgnaq" | tr .............a-z a-za-z
Now it works for both upper and lower case :)
A caveat to using the dots substitution was gave by @iruvar: this command will not work as expected when the input stings has dots. So the following command won't print T.h.a.n.k.s.
tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "G.u.n.a.x.f." | tr .............a-z a-za-z
It will print TMhMaMnMkMsM
instead, substituting the dots to M
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Frederico OliveiraFrederico Oliveira
242
242
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Frederico Oliveira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frederico Oliveira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frederico Oliveira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frederico Oliveira is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510838%2fwhat-do-the-dots-in-this-tr-command-do-tr-a-z-a-za-z-jvpqbov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
(count the dots)
– Michael Homer
2 hours ago
I know there's 13 dots. What I wanna know is how it works. There's no explanation about dots in the manual
– Frederico Oliveira
2 hours ago
1
you had better hope you don't run into a dot in your input text
– iruvar
2 hours ago