A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?How to Enable Syntax Coloring of Pattern Match Variable Only (i.e. Without Coloring any Associated Pattern)?Deep Pattern matching with repeating argumentsHow to apply multiple/complicated requirements for a pattern in a function inputDetecting a more general patternHow do I tell pattern searcher the order in which to search for patterns given in general form?Confused by the opts : OptionsPattern[ ] patternHow does one unpack the contents of a list while using rules to substitute values for each variable?Combinations of multiple matching patternsLogical AND of multiple patternsOptimize DownValues: extract “non-patterns” from Alternatives

Does this sum go infinity?

Employee lack of ownership

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Happy pi day, everyone!

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

Meme-controlled people

Convergence in probability and convergence in distribution

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

What did “the good wine” (τὸν καλὸν οἶνον) mean in John 2:10?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?

How to pronounce "I ♥ Huckabees"?

Time travel from stationary position?

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?

Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?

Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?



A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?


How to Enable Syntax Coloring of Pattern Match Variable Only (i.e. Without Coloring any Associated Pattern)?Deep Pattern matching with repeating argumentsHow to apply multiple/complicated requirements for a pattern in a function inputDetecting a more general patternHow do I tell pattern searcher the order in which to search for patterns given in general form?Confused by the opts : OptionsPattern[ ] patternHow does one unpack the contents of a list while using rules to substitute values for each variable?Combinations of multiple matching patternsLogical AND of multiple patternsOptimize DownValues: extract “non-patterns” from Alternatives













2












$begingroup$


Consider defining a pattern rule, such as



myFun[x_]:=x


As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means



whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument



Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate



myFun[x__]



x__




we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!



Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    55 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    53 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


Consider defining a pattern rule, such as



myFun[x_]:=x


As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means



whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument



Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate



myFun[x__]



x__




we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!



Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    55 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    53 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Consider defining a pattern rule, such as



myFun[x_]:=x


As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means



whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument



Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate



myFun[x__]



x__




we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!



Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Consider defining a pattern rule, such as



myFun[x_]:=x


As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means



whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument



Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate



myFun[x__]



x__




we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!



Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?







pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









KagaratschKagaratsch

4,72731348




4,72731348











  • $begingroup$
    @kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    55 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    53 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    @kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    55 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
    $endgroup$
    – kglr
    53 mins ago















$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago




$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to define myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago




$begingroup$
In the second case Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.
$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:



x__ //FullForm



Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]




While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.



Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    1 min ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193389%2fa-single-argument-pattern-definition-applies-to-multiple-argument-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:



x__ //FullForm



Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]




While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.



Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    1 min ago















3












$begingroup$

The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:



x__ //FullForm



Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]




While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.



Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    1 min ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:



x__ //FullForm



Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]




While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.



Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:



x__ //FullForm



Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]




While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.



Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 49 mins ago









Carl WollCarl Woll

70.4k394184




70.4k394184











  • $begingroup$
    My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    1 min ago
















  • $begingroup$
    My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    1 min ago















$begingroup$
My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago




$begingroup$
My trouble is that after the myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193389%2fa-single-argument-pattern-definition-applies-to-multiple-argument-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

Are small insurances worth itIs insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?Is accident insurance worth it for my kids who play sportsIs insuring property for more than it is worth allowed?At what point does it become worth it to file an insurance claim?Are wage loss insurance programs worth the cost compared to having an emergency fund?When is an event worth insuring against?Is insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?FHA loan just commenced : Any way to get any of the up-front mortgage insurance back?Which types of insurances do I need to buy?Should I carry less renter's insurance if I can self-insure?Mortgage Adviser Signed Me Up For Multiple Home and Life Insurances (UK)Why many travel insurances don't cover country of nationality?