A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?How to Enable Syntax Coloring of Pattern Match Variable Only (i.e. Without Coloring any Associated Pattern)?Deep Pattern matching with repeating argumentsHow to apply multiple/complicated requirements for a pattern in a function inputDetecting a more general patternHow do I tell pattern searcher the order in which to search for patterns given in general form?Confused by the opts : OptionsPattern[ ] patternHow does one unpack the contents of a list while using rules to substitute values for each variable?Combinations of multiple matching patternsLogical AND of multiple patternsOptimize DownValues: extract “non-patterns” from Alternatives
Does this sum go infinity?
Employee lack of ownership
What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?
Happy pi day, everyone!
What are substitutions for coconut in curry?
Meme-controlled people
Convergence in probability and convergence in distribution
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
What did “the good wine” (τὸν καλὸν οἶνον) mean in John 2:10?
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?
How to pronounce "I ♥ Huckabees"?
Time travel from stationary position?
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?
Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day
Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?
What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?
How to Enable Syntax Coloring of Pattern Match Variable Only (i.e. Without Coloring any Associated Pattern)?Deep Pattern matching with repeating argumentsHow to apply multiple/complicated requirements for a pattern in a function inputDetecting a more general patternHow do I tell pattern searcher the order in which to search for patterns given in general form?Confused by the opts : OptionsPattern[ ] patternHow does one unpack the contents of a list while using rules to substitute values for each variable?Combinations of multiple matching patternsLogical AND of multiple patternsOptimize DownValues: extract “non-patterns” from Alternatives
$begingroup$
Consider defining a pattern rule, such as
myFun[x_]:=x
As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means
whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument
Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate
myFun[x__]
x__
we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!
Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?
pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider defining a pattern rule, such as
myFun[x_]:=x
As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means
whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument
Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate
myFun[x__]
x__
we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!
Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?
pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to definemyFun[x_] = xwithout the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
In the second caseSethas the attributeHoldFirstresulting in the same behavior.
$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider defining a pattern rule, such as
myFun[x_]:=x
As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means
whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument
Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate
myFun[x__]
x__
we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!
Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?
pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns
$endgroup$
Consider defining a pattern rule, such as
myFun[x_]:=x
As far as I understand Mathematica syntax, this rule means
whenever myFun appears with a single argument, replace the whole thing by the argument
Now, after the above definition, if we evaluate
myFun[x__]
x__
we see that even though the pattern x__ clearly symbolizes more than one argument, the single argument rule still gets executed!
Is this intended behavior? Maybe my syntax use is improper? How should I specify a single argument pattern rule which does not register with more-than-one argument patterns?
pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns
pattern-matching replacement rule argument-patterns
asked 1 hour ago
KagaratschKagaratsch
4,72731348
4,72731348
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to definemyFun[x_] = xwithout the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
In the second caseSethas the attributeHoldFirstresulting in the same behavior.
$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to definemyFun[x_] = xwithout the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
In the second caseSethas the attributeHoldFirstresulting in the same behavior.
$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to define
myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to define
myFun[x_] = x without the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
In the second case
Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
In the second case
Set has the attribute HoldFirst resulting in the same behavior.$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:
x__ //FullForm
Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]
While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.
Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after themyFun[x_]:=xdefinition, if I try to use/.myFun[x__]->...type of substitutions, the substitution is applied tox__instead ofmyFun[x__]which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use/.myFun[x_,y__]->...instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193389%2fa-single-argument-pattern-definition-applies-to-multiple-argument-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:
x__ //FullForm
Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]
While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.
Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after themyFun[x_]:=xdefinition, if I try to use/.myFun[x__]->...type of substitutions, the substitution is applied tox__instead ofmyFun[x__]which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use/.myFun[x_,y__]->...instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:
x__ //FullForm
Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]
While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.
Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after themyFun[x_]:=xdefinition, if I try to use/.myFun[x__]->...type of substitutions, the substitution is applied tox__instead ofmyFun[x__]which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use/.myFun[x_,y__]->...instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:
x__ //FullForm
Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]
While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.
Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).
$endgroup$
The pattern x__ is a Pattern object:
x__ //FullForm
Pattern[x,BlankSequence[]]
While the pattern object represents multiple arguments in a Rule or a function definition, it is a single object. Hence, your definition applies.
Why are you applying a function to a Pattern object, this is an unusual thing to do. Pattern objects usually appear inside of function definitions (Set or SetDelayed) or inside of rules (Rule or RuleDelayed).
answered 49 mins ago
Carl WollCarl Woll
70.4k394184
70.4k394184
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after themyFun[x_]:=xdefinition, if I try to use/.myFun[x__]->...type of substitutions, the substitution is applied tox__instead ofmyFun[x__]which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use/.myFun[x_,y__]->...instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after themyFun[x_]:=xdefinition, if I try to use/.myFun[x__]->...type of substitutions, the substitution is applied tox__instead ofmyFun[x__]which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use/.myFun[x_,y__]->...instead.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after the
myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
$begingroup$
My trouble is that after the
myFun[x_]:=x definition, if I try to use /.myFun[x__]->... type of substitutions, the substitution is applied to x__ instead of myFun[x__] which is mildly inconvenient. My workaround is to use /.myFun[x_,y__]->... instead.$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
1 min ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193389%2fa-single-argument-pattern-definition-applies-to-multiple-argument-patterns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@kglr If I try to define
myFun[x_] = xwithout the execution delay, I get the same behavior though...$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
55 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
In the second case
Sethas the attributeHoldFirstresulting in the same behavior.$endgroup$
– kglr
53 mins ago