How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the first 5 terms of a Maclaurin Series using division?Estimate error using Taylor SeriesStrategy to recognize and solve sequence and series problems?Use the Maclaurin series for $cos(x)$to compute the value of $cos(5^circ)$ correct to five decimal places.Number of terms to estimate the integral within the indicated accuracy using series!User remainder theorem to estimate $ sum^infty_k=1 frac12(-1)^k+1k^2 $ within $frac25$How do you find nth maclaurin/taylor series or polynomial?Solving an integral using first two terms of the Mclaurin series for $f(x)$Show $log(1-x)=-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nn,forall xin(-1,1)$.Calculating the approximation of an integral using the first four terms of a Maclaurin series.

Hangman Game with C++

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in Into the Spider-Verse?

Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?

Generate an RGB colour grid

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

SF book about people trapped in a series of worlds they imagine

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

I am having problem understanding the behavior of below code in JavaScript

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji

Trademark violation for app?

What is "gratricide"?

Is a ledger board required if the side of my house is wood?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?



How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the first 5 terms of a Maclaurin Series using division?Estimate error using Taylor SeriesStrategy to recognize and solve sequence and series problems?Use the Maclaurin series for $cos(x)$to compute the value of $cos(5^circ)$ correct to five decimal places.Number of terms to estimate the integral within the indicated accuracy using series!User remainder theorem to estimate $ sum^infty_k=1 frac12(-1)^k+1k^2 $ within $frac25$How do you find nth maclaurin/taylor series or polynomial?Solving an integral using first two terms of the Mclaurin series for $f(x)$Show $log(1-x)=-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nn,forall xin(-1,1)$.Calculating the approximation of an integral using the first four terms of a Maclaurin series.










1












$begingroup$


My question:




How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



So my process is this:



  • find the general formula for this series

  • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

  • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



I have the derivatives of each:



$$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
$$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
$$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
$$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    My question:




    How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




    I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



    So my process is this:



    • find the general formula for this series

    • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

    • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

    Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



    I have the derivatives of each:



    $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
    $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
    $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
    $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      My question:




      How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




      I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



      So my process is this:



      • find the general formula for this series

      • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

      • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

      Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



      I have the derivatives of each:



      $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
      $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
      $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
      $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      My question:




      How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




      I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



      So my process is this:



      • find the general formula for this series

      • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

      • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

      Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



      I have the derivatives of each:



      $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
      $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
      $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
      $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$







      sequences-and-series






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Jwan622Jwan622

      2,41111632




      2,41111632




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



          Use directly classical Taylor expansion :



          $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



          with $x=0.4$ and use the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done on such a series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., not present in the truncated series). The condition is that this first discarded term is such that $n$ should be the smallest integer such that :



          $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



          Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




          Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




          Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
          $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
            Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
            $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
            you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
            In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
            In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



            Explicitly,
            $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
            with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-estimat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



              Use directly classical Taylor expansion :



              $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



              with $x=0.4$ and use the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done on such a series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., not present in the truncated series). The condition is that this first discarded term is such that $n$ should be the smallest integer such that :



              $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



              Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




              Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




              Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
              $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                Use directly classical Taylor expansion :



                $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                with $x=0.4$ and use the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done on such a series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., not present in the truncated series). The condition is that this first discarded term is such that $n$ should be the smallest integer such that :



                $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                  Use directly classical Taylor expansion :



                  $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                  with $x=0.4$ and use the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done on such a series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., not present in the truncated series). The condition is that this first discarded term is such that $n$ should be the smallest integer such that :



                  $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                  Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                  Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                  Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                  $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                  Use directly classical Taylor expansion :



                  $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                  with $x=0.4$ and use the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done on such a series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., not present in the truncated series). The condition is that this first discarded term is such that $n$ should be the smallest integer such that :



                  $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                  Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                  Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                  Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                  $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 1 min ago

























                  answered 51 mins ago









                  Jean MarieJean Marie

                  31.6k42355




                  31.6k42355





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                      Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                      $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                      you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                      In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                      In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                      Explicitly,
                      $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                      with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                        Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                        $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                        you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                        In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                        In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                        Explicitly,
                        $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                        with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                          Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                          $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                          you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                          In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                          In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                          Explicitly,
                          $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                          with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                          Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                          $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                          you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                          In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                          In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                          Explicitly,
                          $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                          with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 45 mins ago









                          Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

                          283k23273508




                          283k23273508



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-estimat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Lioubotyn Sommaire Géographie | Histoire | Population | Notes et références | Liens externes | Menu de navigationlubotin.kharkov.uamodifier« Recensements et estimations de la population depuis 1897 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2010, 2011 et 2012 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2011, 2012 et 2013 »Informations officiellesCartes topographiquesCarte routièrem

                              Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

                              Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm