What's the difference between `auto x = vector()` and `vector x`? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?What is the difference between #include <filename> and #include “filename”?Regular cast vs. static_cast vs. dynamic_castWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListDifference between private, public, and protected inheritanceWhat is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?What is the difference between 'typedef' and 'using' in C++11?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?
Multi tool use
Determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.
Single word antonym of "flightless"
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
How can I fade player when goes inside or outside of the area?
Should I call the interviewer directly, if HR aren't responding?
Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?
What is a Meta algorithm?
Were Kohanim forbidden from serving in King David's army?
Did Xerox really develop the first LAN?
What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?
Dominant seventh chord in the major scale contains diminished triad of the seventh?
If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
I need to find the potential function of a vector field.
3 doors, three guards, one stone
Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?
What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
What's the difference between `auto x = vector<int>()` and `vector<int> x`?
Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?
How much radiation do nuclear physics experiments expose researchers to nowadays?
How to bypass password on Windows XP account?
What's the difference between `auto x = vector()` and `vector x`?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
Should we burninate the [wrap] tag?What is the difference between #include <filename> and #include “filename”?Regular cast vs. static_cast vs. dynamic_castWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListDifference between private, public, and protected inheritanceWhat is the difference between const int*, const int * const, and int const *?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?What is the difference between 'typedef' and 'using' in C++11?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?
c++ vector stl initialization
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
add a comment |
I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?
c++ vector stl initialization
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
2
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?
c++ vector stl initialization
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
I am writing some code and have a question.
What is the difference between auto x = vector<int>(); and vector<int> x;? Are they all the same or there's some difference with the complexity?
c++ vector stl initialization
c++ vector stl initialization
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
edited 2 hours ago
songyuanyao
94.5k11183251
94.5k11183251
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
asked 2 hours ago
AutoratchAutoratch
555
555
2
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago
2
2
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:
even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:
The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55700049%2fwhats-the-difference-between-auto-x-vectorint-and-vectorint-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:
even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:
The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
add a comment |
They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:
even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:
The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
add a comment |
They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:
even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:
The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
They have the same effect since C++17. Both construct an object named x with type std::vector<int>, which is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
Precisely the 1st one is copy initialization, x is copy-initialized from a value-initialized temporary. From C++17 this kind of copy elision is guaranteed, as the result x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector directly. Before C++17, copy elision is an optimization:
even when it takes place and the copy/move (since C++11) constructor is not called, it still must be present and accessible (as if no optimization happened at all), otherwise the program is ill-formed:
The 2nd one is default initialization, as a class type x is initialized by the default constructor of std::vector.
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
answered 2 hours ago
songyuanyaosongyuanyao
94.5k11183251
94.5k11183251
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55700049%2fwhats-the-difference-between-auto-x-vectorint-and-vectorint-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
qINy1qNl8,8EM a1Dh4DQYnfvl,90 pQt8pMNbMdcC,hAtwu,jkIKrOgX8Kr 2,oFcEbsRV6OXeOnXgg0m9XLWZJ
2
The first results in a call to a default constructor and a call to a move constructor. The second results in a call to a default constructor. Even if the compiler optimizes both to result in the same assembly, the second one is the one to go for readability.
– DeiDei
2 hours ago