Finding NDSolve method detailsHow to find out which method Mathematica selected?inspecting step size and order of $tt NDSolve$What does MaxStepFraction do?How does Mathematica resolve symbolic systems of inequalities?NDSolve and strange “nonlinear coefficients problem”The idea behind Stiffness switching method with NDsolveProblems when solving a nonlinear PDE system with NDSolveSingularity treatment in a simple problemPDEs : automatic method choice : TensorProductGrid or FiniteElement?NDSolve struggling with tricky boundary conditionsNDSolve and memory usedDetails of NDSolve calling LSODA

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

Creature in Shazam mid-credits scene?

Argument list too long when zipping large list of certain files in a folder

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

Why do we read the Megillah by night and by day?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

I am looking for the correct translation of love for the phrase "in this sign love"

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Delivering sarcasm

Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?

Create all possible words using a set or letters

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

Start making guitar arrangements

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone



Finding NDSolve method details


How to find out which method Mathematica selected?inspecting step size and order of $tt NDSolve$What does MaxStepFraction do?How does Mathematica resolve symbolic systems of inequalities?NDSolve and strange “nonlinear coefficients problem”The idea behind Stiffness switching method with NDsolveProblems when solving a nonlinear PDE system with NDSolveSingularity treatment in a simple problemPDEs : automatic method choice : TensorProductGrid or FiniteElement?NDSolve struggling with tricky boundary conditionsNDSolve and memory usedDetails of NDSolve calling LSODA













2












$begingroup$


I have eqs about the NDSolve, I know this code given the solving automatically.



How can I find out what method is used behind the scenes? How can I gauge the reliability level, find how many iterations have been used, the order of method. How can I estimate the error?



I found hints on this site, but I still do not fully understand.



It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper?



I used this code related to my system:



r = 0.431201; β = 2.99 *10^-6; σ = 0.7; δ = 0.57;
m = 0.3, η = 0.1, μ = 0.1, ρ = 0.3;


S = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - β N1[t]) - η N1[t] I1[t],
 I1'[t] == σ + (ρ N1[t] I1[t])/( m + N1[t]) - δ I1[t] - μ N1[t] I1[t];

c = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

Select[Flatten[
 Trace[
 NDSolve[S, c, N1, I1, t, 0, 30], 
 TraceInternal -> True]], 
 !FreeQ[#, Method | NDSolve`MethodData] &]


but I don't understand the output.






differential-equations implementation-details







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


I have eqs about the NDSolve, I know this code given the solving automatically.



How can I find out what method is used behind the scenes? How can I gauge the reliability level, find how many iterations have been used, the order of method. How can I estimate the error?



I found hints on this site, but I still do not fully understand.



It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper?



I used this code related to my system:



r = 0.431201; β = 2.99 *10^-6; σ = 0.7; δ = 0.57;
m = 0.3, η = 0.1, μ = 0.1, ρ = 0.3;


S = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - β N1[t]) - η N1[t] I1[t],
 I1'[t] == σ + (ρ N1[t] I1[t])/( m + N1[t]) - δ I1[t] - μ N1[t] I1[t];

c = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

Select[Flatten[
 Trace[
 NDSolve[S, c, N1, I1, t, 0, 30], 
 TraceInternal -> True]], 
 !FreeQ[#, Method | NDSolve`MethodData] &]


but I don't understand the output.






differential-equations implementation-details







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have eqs about the NDSolve, I know this code given the solving automatically.



How can I find out what method is used behind the scenes? How can I gauge the reliability level, find how many iterations have been used, the order of method. How can I estimate the error?



I found hints on this site, but I still do not fully understand.



It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper?



I used this code related to my system:



r = 0.431201; β = 2.99 *10^-6; σ = 0.7; δ = 0.57;
m = 0.3, η = 0.1, μ = 0.1, ρ = 0.3;


S = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - β N1[t]) - η N1[t] I1[t],
 I1'[t] == σ + (ρ N1[t] I1[t])/( m + N1[t]) - δ I1[t] - μ N1[t] I1[t];

c = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

Select[Flatten[
 Trace[
 NDSolve[S, c, N1, I1, t, 0, 30], 
 TraceInternal -> True]], 
 !FreeQ[#, Method | NDSolve`MethodData] &]


but I don't understand the output.






differential-equations implementation-details







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have eqs about the NDSolve, I know this code given the solving automatically.



How can I find out what method is used behind the scenes? How can I gauge the reliability level, find how many iterations have been used, the order of method. How can I estimate the error?



I found hints on this site, but I still do not fully understand.



It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper?



I used this code related to my system:



r = 0.431201; β = 2.99 *10^-6; σ = 0.7; δ = 0.57;
m = 0.3, η = 0.1, μ = 0.1, ρ = 0.3;


S = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - β N1[t]) - η N1[t] I1[t],
 I1'[t] == σ + (ρ N1[t] I1[t])/( m + N1[t]) - δ I1[t] - μ N1[t] I1[t];

c = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

Select[Flatten[
 Trace[
 NDSolve[S, c, N1, I1, t, 0, 30], 
 TraceInternal -> True]], 
 !FreeQ[#, Method | NDSolve`MethodData] &]


but I don't understand the output.






differential-equations implementation-details




differential-equations implementation-details






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









xzczd

27.4k573254




27.4k573254










asked 5 hours ago









sana alharbisana alharbi

356




356







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
    $endgroup$
    – xzczd
    2 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/145/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Another partial duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/102704/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
You say you don't understand some technique or other, nor the output of your Trace[] command. But the first is a very general statement about things already explained and the second is about a command that no one else can reproduce
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
"It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
$endgroup$
– xzczd
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
"It is impossible to say NDSolve has automatically solution for publishing paper. " Simply saying "I've used NDSolve function of software Mathematica" is enough in many cases, AFAIK.
$endgroup$
– xzczd
2 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
$endgroup$
– xzczd
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Well, if the reviewer insists on such stuff, given that your system isn't that difficult, a possible workaround at this point is to choose a primary method like classical RK4 to solve the problem. The way to choose classical RK4 in NDSolve can be found in tutorial/NDSolveExplicitRungeKutta#1456351317, then you just need to set Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients, StartingStepSize -> 1/20000, MaxSteps -> Infinity in NDSolve. The solving process is slower but gives the same result as given by default.
$endgroup$
– xzczd
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Comment



In response to your question, you already got very valuable comments. I will just try to comment on




How can I estimate the error?




For this I am going to plot residual error at steps and time, which will show the reliability and accuracy of NDSolve, 



r = 0.431201; [Beta] = 2.99*10^-6; [Sigma] = 0.7; [Delta] = 0.57;
m = 0.3; [Eta] = 0.1; [Mu] = 0.1; [Rho] = 0.3; 

ode = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - [Beta] N1[t]) - [Eta] N1[t] I1[t], 
 I1'[t] == [Sigma] + ([Rho] N1[t] I1[t])/(m + N1[t]) - [Delta] I1[t] - [Mu] N1[t] I1[t];

bcs = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

residuals = ode /. Equal -> Subtract;

s = NDSolve[ode, bcs, N1, I1, t, 20, InterpolationOrder -> All];

N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

ListPlot[Abs[Flatten /@ (residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s)], Frame -> True]


enter image description here



With[data = Table[t, Abs@residuals[[1]] /. s, t, N1["Coordinates"] /. s // Flatten], 
 ListLogPlot[data, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> All]]


enter image description here



Note: I adopted the above from this website but unable to find the link.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193858%2ffinding-ndsolve-method-details%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Comment



    In response to your question, you already got very valuable comments. I will just try to comment on




    How can I estimate the error?




    For this I am going to plot residual error at steps and time, which will show the reliability and accuracy of NDSolve, 



    r = 0.431201; [Beta] = 2.99*10^-6; [Sigma] = 0.7; [Delta] = 0.57;
    m = 0.3; [Eta] = 0.1; [Mu] = 0.1; [Rho] = 0.3; 

    ode = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - [Beta] N1[t]) - [Eta] N1[t] I1[t], 
     I1'[t] == [Sigma] + ([Rho] N1[t] I1[t])/(m + N1[t]) - [Delta] I1[t] - [Mu] N1[t] I1[t];

    bcs = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

    residuals = ode /. Equal -> Subtract;

    s = NDSolve[ode, bcs, N1, I1, t, 20, InterpolationOrder -> All];

    N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

    residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

    ListPlot[Abs[Flatten /@ (residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s)], Frame -> True]


    enter image description here



    With[data = Table[t, Abs@residuals[[1]] /. s, t, N1["Coordinates"] /. s // Flatten], 
     ListLogPlot[data, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> All]]


    enter image description here



    Note: I adopted the above from this website but unable to find the link.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Comment



      In response to your question, you already got very valuable comments. I will just try to comment on




      How can I estimate the error?




      For this I am going to plot residual error at steps and time, which will show the reliability and accuracy of NDSolve, 



      r = 0.431201; [Beta] = 2.99*10^-6; [Sigma] = 0.7; [Delta] = 0.57;
      m = 0.3; [Eta] = 0.1; [Mu] = 0.1; [Rho] = 0.3; 

      ode = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - [Beta] N1[t]) - [Eta] N1[t] I1[t], 
       I1'[t] == [Sigma] + ([Rho] N1[t] I1[t])/(m + N1[t]) - [Delta] I1[t] - [Mu] N1[t] I1[t];

      bcs = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

      residuals = ode /. Equal -> Subtract;

      s = NDSolve[ode, bcs, N1, I1, t, 20, InterpolationOrder -> All];

      N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

      residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

      ListPlot[Abs[Flatten /@ (residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s)], Frame -> True]


      enter image description here



      With[data = Table[t, Abs@residuals[[1]] /. s, t, N1["Coordinates"] /. s // Flatten], 
       ListLogPlot[data, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> All]]


      enter image description here



      Note: I adopted the above from this website but unable to find the link.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Comment



        In response to your question, you already got very valuable comments. I will just try to comment on




        How can I estimate the error?




        For this I am going to plot residual error at steps and time, which will show the reliability and accuracy of NDSolve, 



        r = 0.431201; [Beta] = 2.99*10^-6; [Sigma] = 0.7; [Delta] = 0.57;
        m = 0.3; [Eta] = 0.1; [Mu] = 0.1; [Rho] = 0.3; 

        ode = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - [Beta] N1[t]) - [Eta] N1[t] I1[t], 
         I1'[t] == [Sigma] + ([Rho] N1[t] I1[t])/(m + N1[t]) - [Delta] I1[t] - [Mu] N1[t] I1[t];

        bcs = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

        residuals = ode /. Equal -> Subtract;

        s = NDSolve[ode, bcs, N1, I1, t, 20, InterpolationOrder -> All];

        N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

        residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

        ListPlot[Abs[Flatten /@ (residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s)], Frame -> True]


        enter image description here



        With[data = Table[t, Abs@residuals[[1]] /. s, t, N1["Coordinates"] /. s // Flatten], 
         ListLogPlot[data, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> All]]


        enter image description here



        Note: I adopted the above from this website but unable to find the link.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Comment



        In response to your question, you already got very valuable comments. I will just try to comment on




        How can I estimate the error?




        For this I am going to plot residual error at steps and time, which will show the reliability and accuracy of NDSolve, 



        r = 0.431201; [Beta] = 2.99*10^-6; [Sigma] = 0.7; [Delta] = 0.57;
        m = 0.3; [Eta] = 0.1; [Mu] = 0.1; [Rho] = 0.3; 

        ode = N1'[t] == r N1[t] (1 - [Beta] N1[t]) - [Eta] N1[t] I1[t], 
         I1'[t] == [Sigma] + ([Rho] N1[t] I1[t])/(m + N1[t]) - [Delta] I1[t] - [Mu] N1[t] I1[t];

        bcs = N1[0] == 1, I1[0] == 1.22;

        residuals = ode /. Equal -> Subtract;

        s = NDSolve[ode, bcs, N1, I1, t, 20, InterpolationOrder -> All];

        N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

        residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s;

        ListPlot[Abs[Flatten /@ (residuals /. t -> N1["Coordinates"] /. s)], Frame -> True]


        enter image description here



        With[data = Table[t, Abs@residuals[[1]] /. s, t, N1["Coordinates"] /. s // Flatten], 
         ListLogPlot[data, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> All]]


        enter image description here



        Note: I adopted the above from this website but unable to find the link.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        zhkzhk

        10k11433




        10k11433



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193858%2ffinding-ndsolve-method-details%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

            Image
            Personnalité américaine du monde des affairesPersonnalité féminine françaiseNaissance en décembre 1841Naissance à ParisDécès en mai 1904Décès à 62 ansDécès à Paris 17 décembre1841Paris12 mai1904Isaac Merritt SingerSingerNew York1863guerre civile américaineParisAngleterreguerre de 1870DevonOldway Mansion (en) PaigntonWinnarettaEdmond de Polignacduchesse DecazesdollarsVictor ReubsaetParisHumbert I er d'Italieviolon de StradivariusStatue de la LibertéBartholdi Isabella Eugénie Boyer.mw-parser-output .entete.humainbackground-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Picto_infobox_manwoman.png") Isabella Eugénie Boyer. Titre de noblesse Duchesse Biographie Naissance 17 décembre 1841 Paris Décès 12 mai 1904 (à 62 ans) Paris Sépulture Cimetière de Passy Nationalité Française Domicile Oldway Mansion ( en ) Activité Mannequin Conjoint Isaac Merritt Singer (depuis 1863) Enfants Winnaretta Singer Isabelle Singer ( d ) Paris Singer Washington Singer ( en ) Mortimer
            Read more

            Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm

            Image
            Naissance en 1798Décès en septembre 1872Histoire de l'Afrique du SudRoi zoulouPersonnalité africaine du XIXe siècle projets correspondantsNotes et référencesQuelles sources sont attendues ?Comment ajouter mes sources ?Babanango (en) Royaume zoulouShakaDinganerois de la nation zoulouinDunaNdlela kaSompisi (en) CetshwayoAndries Pretoriusforêt d'Hlatikhulu (en) bataille de NdondakusukaCetshwayoJohn Robert Dunn (en) Tugela Cet article est une ébauche concernant l’Afrique et l’histoire. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant ( comment ? ) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Cet article ne cite pas suffisamment ses sources (juillet 2012). Si vous disposez d'ouvrages ou d'articles de référence ou si vous connaissez des sites web de qualité traitant du thème abordé ici, merci de compléter l'article en donnant les références utiles à sa vérifiabilité et en les liant à la section « Notes et références » En pratique : Quelles sources sont
            Read more

            Hornos de Moncalvillo Voir aussi | Menu de navigationmodifierm

            Image
            Commune dans La Rioja projets correspondantscommunauté autonomeLa RiojaEspagne Cet article est une ébauche concernant une commune de La Rioja. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant ( comment ? ) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Hornos de Moncalvillo.mw-parser-output .entete.mapbackground-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png") Administration Pays   Espagne Communauté autonome  La Rioja Province  La Rioja Comarque Logroño Budget 242 488 (2009) Maire Mandat Antonio Mayoral Cerrolaza 2007 Code postal 26372 Démographie Population 96  hab. ( 2010 ) Densité 13  hab./km 2 Géographie Coordonnées 42° 23′ 30″ nord, 2° 35′ 06″ ouest Altitude 676  m Superficie 740   ha  = 7,4  km 2 Localisation Géolocalisation sur la carte : Espagne Hornos de Moncalvillo Géolocalisation sur la carte : Espagne Hornos de Moncalvillo modifier   Hornos de Moncalvillo est une commune de la communauté autonome de La Rioja, en
            Read more