Longest common substring in linear timeComputing the longest common substring of two strings using suffix arraysFind longest common substring using a rolling hashWhich algorithm to use to find all common substring (LCS case) with really big stringsFinding the longest repeating subsequenceHow to find longest recurring pattern from lage string data set?Longest substring with consecutive repetitionsDoes the Longest Common Subsequence problem reduce to its binary version?Substring problems in suffix treesNumber of optimal solutions for Longest Common Subsequence (Substring) problemLongest common sequence matrix giving wrong answer

How to bake one texture for one mesh with multiple textures blender 2.8

Closed-form expression for certain product

Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?

If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?

Not using 's' for he/she/it

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

"Spoil" vs "Ruin"

dpdt switch to spst switch

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

Added a new user on Ubuntu, set password not working?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density

Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Longest common substring in linear time

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

What does chmod -u do?

How to indicate a cut out for a product window



Longest common substring in linear time


Computing the longest common substring of two strings using suffix arraysFind longest common substring using a rolling hashWhich algorithm to use to find all common substring (LCS case) with really big stringsFinding the longest repeating subsequenceHow to find longest recurring pattern from lage string data set?Longest substring with consecutive repetitionsDoes the Longest Common Subsequence problem reduce to its binary version?Substring problems in suffix treesNumber of optimal solutions for Longest Common Subsequence (Substring) problemLongest common sequence matrix giving wrong answer













2












$begingroup$


We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
Can a solution be found in only linear time?






algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
    Can a solution be found in only linear time?






    algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
      Can a solution be found in only linear time?






      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
      Can a solution be found in only linear time?






      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring




      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Discrete lizard♦

      4,44011537




      4,44011537










      asked 2 hours ago









      Manoharsinh RanaManoharsinh Rana

      917




      917




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



          Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




          The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




          Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            40 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



          SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



          While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago











          • $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            43 mins ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



          In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



          Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "419"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105969%2flongest-common-substring-in-linear-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              40 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              40 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 44 mins ago









            Apass.JackApass.Jack

            13.3k1939




            13.3k1939











            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              40 mins ago

















            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              40 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            40 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            40 mins ago












            1












            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              43 mins ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              43 mins ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            Discrete lizard♦Discrete lizard

            4,44011537




            4,44011537











            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              43 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              43 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago





            $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago













            $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            43 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            43 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



            In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



            Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



              In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



              Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



                In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



                Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



                In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



                Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                D.W.♦D.W.

                102k12127291




                102k12127291



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105969%2flongest-common-substring-in-linear-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

                    Image
                    Personnalité américaine du monde des affairesPersonnalité féminine françaiseNaissance en décembre 1841Naissance à ParisDécès en mai 1904Décès à 62 ansDécès à Paris 17 décembre1841Paris12 mai1904Isaac Merritt SingerSingerNew York1863guerre civile américaineParisAngleterreguerre de 1870DevonOldway Mansion (en) PaigntonWinnarettaEdmond de Polignacduchesse DecazesdollarsVictor ReubsaetParisHumbert I er d'Italieviolon de StradivariusStatue de la LibertéBartholdi Isabella Eugénie Boyer.mw-parser-output .entete.humainbackground-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Picto_infobox_manwoman.png") Isabella Eugénie Boyer. Titre de noblesse Duchesse Biographie Naissance 17 décembre 1841 Paris Décès 12 mai 1904 (à 62 ans) Paris Sépulture Cimetière de Passy Nationalité Française Domicile Oldway Mansion ( en ) Activité Mannequin Conjoint Isaac Merritt Singer (depuis 1863) Enfants Winnaretta Singer Isabelle Singer ( d ) Paris Singer Washington Singer ( en ) Mortimer
                    Read more

                    Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm

                    Image
                    Naissance en 1798Décès en septembre 1872Histoire de l'Afrique du SudRoi zoulouPersonnalité africaine du XIXe siècle projets correspondantsNotes et référencesQuelles sources sont attendues ?Comment ajouter mes sources ?Babanango (en) Royaume zoulouShakaDinganerois de la nation zoulouinDunaNdlela kaSompisi (en) CetshwayoAndries Pretoriusforêt d'Hlatikhulu (en) bataille de NdondakusukaCetshwayoJohn Robert Dunn (en) Tugela Cet article est une ébauche concernant l’Afrique et l’histoire. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant ( comment ? ) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Cet article ne cite pas suffisamment ses sources (juillet 2012). Si vous disposez d'ouvrages ou d'articles de référence ou si vous connaissez des sites web de qualité traitant du thème abordé ici, merci de compléter l'article en donnant les références utiles à sa vérifiabilité et en les liant à la section « Notes et références » En pratique : Quelles sources sont
                    Read more

                    Hornos de Moncalvillo Voir aussi | Menu de navigationmodifierm

                    Image
                    Commune dans La Rioja projets correspondantscommunauté autonomeLa RiojaEspagne Cet article est une ébauche concernant une commune de La Rioja. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant ( comment ? ) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Hornos de Moncalvillo.mw-parser-output .entete.mapbackground-image:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Picto_infobox_map.png") Administration Pays   Espagne Communauté autonome  La Rioja Province  La Rioja Comarque Logroño Budget 242 488 (2009) Maire Mandat Antonio Mayoral Cerrolaza 2007 Code postal 26372 Démographie Population 96  hab. ( 2010 ) Densité 13  hab./km 2 Géographie Coordonnées 42° 23′ 30″ nord, 2° 35′ 06″ ouest Altitude 676  m Superficie 740   ha  = 7,4  km 2 Localisation Géolocalisation sur la carte : Espagne Hornos de Moncalvillo Géolocalisation sur la carte : Espagne Hornos de Moncalvillo modifier   Hornos de Moncalvillo est une commune de la communauté autonome de La Rioja, en
                    Read more