Resizing summation symbol in tufte-bookmaking a big summation sign

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

What does "^L" mean in C?

Turning a hard to access nut?

Knife as defense against stray dogs

The average age of first marriage in Russia

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

Light propagating through a sound wave

gerund and noun applications

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Brake pads destroying wheels

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

What if (if any) the reason to buy in small local stores?

Constant Current LED Circuit

Practical application of matrices and determinants

What is the plural TO / OF something

Naive Monte Carlo, MCMC and their use in Bayesian Theory

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?

Comment Box for Substitution Method of Integrals



Resizing summation symbol in tufte-book


making a big summation sign













0















I am trying to increase the size of a summation symbol in tufte-book, and followed Stefan Kollwitz's approach here. While I indeed get the larger summation size (as desired), I also get annoying question marks.



documentclass[twoside,symmetric]tufte-book

usepackageamsmath

usepackagerelsize

begindocument

chapterFirst chapter

beginequation‎
‎cos x‎ ‎=‎ mathlargermathlarger‎‎sum_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎
endequation‎

enddocument


large summation sign, but annoying question marks



I'm not wedded to using amsmath and relsize, so any simple approach would be acceptable.



I also want to use limits, as in:



 sumlimits_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎


to place the limits clearly beneath and above the (larger) summation symbol.









share


























    0















    I am trying to increase the size of a summation symbol in tufte-book, and followed Stefan Kollwitz's approach here. While I indeed get the larger summation size (as desired), I also get annoying question marks.



    documentclass[twoside,symmetric]tufte-book

    usepackageamsmath

    usepackagerelsize

    begindocument

    chapterFirst chapter

    beginequation‎
    ‎cos x‎ ‎=‎ mathlargermathlarger‎‎sum_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎
    endequation‎

    enddocument


    large summation sign, but annoying question marks



    I'm not wedded to using amsmath and relsize, so any simple approach would be acceptable.



    I also want to use limits, as in:



     sumlimits_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎


    to place the limits clearly beneath and above the (larger) summation symbol.









    share
























      0












      0








      0








      I am trying to increase the size of a summation symbol in tufte-book, and followed Stefan Kollwitz's approach here. While I indeed get the larger summation size (as desired), I also get annoying question marks.



      documentclass[twoside,symmetric]tufte-book

      usepackageamsmath

      usepackagerelsize

      begindocument

      chapterFirst chapter

      beginequation‎
      ‎cos x‎ ‎=‎ mathlargermathlarger‎‎sum_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎
      endequation‎

      enddocument


      large summation sign, but annoying question marks



      I'm not wedded to using amsmath and relsize, so any simple approach would be acceptable.



      I also want to use limits, as in:



       sumlimits_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎


      to place the limits clearly beneath and above the (larger) summation symbol.









      share














      I am trying to increase the size of a summation symbol in tufte-book, and followed Stefan Kollwitz's approach here. While I indeed get the larger summation size (as desired), I also get annoying question marks.



      documentclass[twoside,symmetric]tufte-book

      usepackageamsmath

      usepackagerelsize

      begindocument

      chapterFirst chapter

      beginequation‎
      ‎cos x‎ ‎=‎ mathlargermathlarger‎‎sum_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎
      endequation‎

      enddocument


      large summation sign, but annoying question marks



      I'm not wedded to using amsmath and relsize, so any simple approach would be acceptable.



      I also want to use limits, as in:



       sumlimits_n=0^infty‎ frac(ix)^2n(2n)!‎‎


      to place the limits clearly beneath and above the (larger) summation symbol.







      relsize





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 8 mins ago









      David G. StorkDavid G. Stork

      25619




      25619




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480000%2fresizing-summation-symbol-in-tufte-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480000%2fresizing-summation-symbol-in-tufte-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

          Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

          Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?How do we write a story about genocide committed by a fascist government without falling into the “Nazi Germany” cliché?Researching sensitive subjectsShould I avoid “lecturing” my readers?Archetypical/popular historical fictionHow to write a “strong” passage?Will what worked 'back then' work today? (Novels)Historical Fiction: using you and thouHow do you make characters relatable if they exist in a completely different moral context?How do I write a MODERN combat/violence scene without being dry?Fictionizing firsthand accounts from history?Is it possible to narrate a novel in a faux-historical style without alienating the reader?