Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th CenturyHow long will it take to form a new dialect and language in underground steampunk London?Could a 19th century space gun be of any use today in space exploration?What would the industrial age be like without oil and coal?What would a steam locomotive look like if steam power became yet again the main type used in rail transportation?Post apocalyptic science based storyCan this world invent gas cylinders early?Designing an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardHow to combat magic as science?Could people of the 14th century create an inline engine for use in aircraft and vehicles?Counteracting Perverse Incentive effects in 1902 Hanoi rat population

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

How do I implement a file system driver driver in Linux?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?

Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?

Customize circled numbers

Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?

Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?

Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

What's the difference between 違法 and 不法?

anything or something to eat

We have a love-hate relationship

Why has "pence" been used in this sentence, not "pences"?

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

MAXDOP Settings for SQL Server 2014

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ



Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century


How long will it take to form a new dialect and language in underground steampunk London?Could a 19th century space gun be of any use today in space exploration?What would the industrial age be like without oil and coal?What would a steam locomotive look like if steam power became yet again the main type used in rail transportation?Post apocalyptic science based storyCan this world invent gas cylinders early?Designing an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardHow to combat magic as science?Could people of the 14th century create an inline engine for use in aircraft and vehicles?Counteracting Perverse Incentive effects in 1902 Hanoi rat population













2












$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    16 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    16 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Would it be possible for a nation with 19th century to very early 20th Century technology and history and hot desert climate to utilize solar power for electrical generation as a substitute for coal or replace the use of coal in any other way?



Hope this question is more to the liking of this stack exchange.



There is not an abundance of national coal however rivers and ocean could allow for importation of coal.







technology hard-science steampunk






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 mins ago







Echo61505

















asked 2 hours ago









Echo61505Echo61505

766




766











  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    16 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
    $endgroup$
    – Raditz_35
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Dann that typo..
    $endgroup$
    – Echo61505
    16 mins ago















$begingroup$
Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
$endgroup$
– Raditz_35
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not in the way you asked the question, absolutely not. If it wasn't done back then, it can't be done with 19th century technology, that would be a paradox. But I assume you dont mean literally 19th century technology but something else? Perhaps instead of asking this question, describe what you want to do first and then tell us the exact part, details are king here, that you are unsure about or don't know how to do.
$endgroup$
– Raditz_35
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
$endgroup$
– Renan
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Not with solar panels, no, but remember that coal IS solar indirectly.
$endgroup$
– Renan
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Sorry, but could you state directly what "h se" is, because when I google it, the results are confusing and not related to your question.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
28 mins ago




$begingroup$
In daytime they had daylight, and solar power does not work at night (at least not with any imaginable technology of the time), this would put a crimp in the development of electric light...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
28 mins ago












$begingroup$
Dann that typo..
$endgroup$
– Echo61505
16 mins ago




$begingroup$
Dann that typo..
$endgroup$
– Echo61505
16 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    29 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142249%2fcould-solar-power-be-utilized-and-substitute-coal-in-the-19th-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    29 mins ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    29 mins ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, they could. You "just" need a large mirror to concentrate sunlight on a boiler to produce the steam. Power plants that use this principle are in use today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility



The first problem you have is with economy. Burning coal is just way too cheap if you have it available, and it's much easier to get a few megawatts of heat out of burning coal than it is to get the same amount of heat from mirrors. Simply because you need about one square meter of mirror for each kilowatt of sunlight you want to collect, and the mirror needs to be continuously adjusted to the sun. A single man shoveling coal into an engine produces much, much more than just a single kilowatt of heat...



You can offset the economy problem by making coal hard-to-get in your country.



However, the second problem remains: Efficiency. Early steam engines were brutally inefficient, turning only 1% or 2% (Watt's optimized version!) of the heat into actual mechanical work. So, if you have a giant 10x10m mirror ($100m^2$), you only get 1kW or 2kW of usable power output. Anything that requires more energy than that quickly becomes infeasible to power with the many, enormous mirrors you need, which all require man-power to adjust to the sun continuously.



Of course, you can offset this by a) allowing close to modern steam turbines, and b) fancy clockworks that automagically adjust the mirrors. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to get the power from the power plants to where it's actually needed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









cmastercmaster

3,522815




3,522815











  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    29 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    29 mins ago















$begingroup$
Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
29 mins ago




$begingroup$
Given that the primary motive for building power plants was electric light, and the mirrors don't work at night...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
29 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142249%2fcould-solar-power-be-utilized-and-substitute-coal-in-the-19th-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

Lioubotyn Sommaire Géographie | Histoire | Population | Notes et références | Liens externes | Menu de navigationlubotin.kharkov.uamodifier« Recensements et estimations de la population depuis 1897 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2010, 2011 et 2012 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2011, 2012 et 2013 »Informations officiellesCartes topographiquesCarte routièrem

Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm