Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?Need a resource for creative writingWhy do heroes need to have a physical mark?Do you need to have your major plot point established in the first few chapters?Do you need to have an introduction at the beginning of every book in a series?How to write without the need for filtering and wordiness?Do I need to have a degree to become a writer?Effectively conveying an unreliable narratorIs it true that writers don't really need agents and they can just query publishers directly, as Dean Wesley Smith says?Is a nuclear apocalypse cliche?Write for an audience or find an audience for your writing?

Is it possible that a question has only two answers?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

PTIJ: Why does only a Shor Tam ask at the Seder, and not a Shor Mu'ad?

How does Ehrenfest's theorem apply to the quantum harmonic oscillator?

Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?

How to design an organic heat-shield?

Trouble making an executable as a service

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

Signed and unsigned numbers

Gaining more land

Getting the || sign while using Kurier

What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?

MySQL importing CSV files really slow

Making a kiddush for a girl that has hard time finding shidduch

Nylon switch cover plate screws

This Alpine town?

What are you allowed to do while using the Warlock's Eldritch Master feature?

What was the motivation for developing the plugin API?

Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?

Can we track matter through time by looking at different depths in space?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Shifting between bemols and diesis in the key signature

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?



Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?


Need a resource for creative writingWhy do heroes need to have a physical mark?Do you need to have your major plot point established in the first few chapters?Do you need to have an introduction at the beginning of every book in a series?How to write without the need for filtering and wordiness?Do I need to have a degree to become a writer?Effectively conveying an unreliable narratorIs it true that writers don't really need agents and they can just query publishers directly, as Dean Wesley Smith says?Is a nuclear apocalypse cliche?Write for an audience or find an audience for your writing?













1















So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.



And that is not science.



I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.



But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?










share|improve this question






















  • Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

    – Spectrosaurus
    3 hours ago












  • @Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago











  • This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

    – bruglesco
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

    – Secespitus
    3 hours ago















1















So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.



And that is not science.



I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.



But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?










share|improve this question






















  • Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

    – Spectrosaurus
    3 hours ago












  • @Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago











  • This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

    – bruglesco
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

    – Secespitus
    3 hours ago













1












1








1








So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.



And that is not science.



I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.



But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?










share|improve this question














So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.



And that is not science.



I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.



But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?







creative-writing readers






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









weakdnaweakdna

2,92631857




2,92631857












  • Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

    – Spectrosaurus
    3 hours ago












  • @Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago











  • This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

    – bruglesco
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

    – Secespitus
    3 hours ago

















  • Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago






  • 3





    Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

    – Spectrosaurus
    3 hours ago












  • @Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

    – weakdna
    3 hours ago











  • This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

    – bruglesco
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

    – Secespitus
    3 hours ago
















Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

– weakdna
3 hours ago





Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?

– weakdna
3 hours ago




3




3





Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago






Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)

– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago














@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

– weakdna
3 hours ago





@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.

– weakdna
3 hours ago













This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

– bruglesco
3 hours ago





This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.

– bruglesco
3 hours ago




2




2





If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

– Secespitus
3 hours ago





If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.

– Secespitus
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...



If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.



I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.



Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D



There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.






share|improve this answer






























    3














    No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)



    That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.



    Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "166"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43289%2fdo-i-really-need-to-have-a-scientific-explanation-for-my-premise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5














      Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...



      If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.



      I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.



      Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D



      There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.






      share|improve this answer



























        5














        Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...



        If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.



        I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.



        Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D



        There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.






        share|improve this answer

























          5












          5








          5







          Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...



          If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.



          I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.



          Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D



          There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.






          share|improve this answer













          Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...



          If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.



          I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.



          Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D



          There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          SecespitusSecespitus

          6,87923169




          6,87923169





















              3














              No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)



              That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.



              Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.






              share|improve this answer



























                3














                No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)



                That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.



                Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)



                  That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.



                  Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)



                  That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.



                  Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  AmadeusAmadeus

                  53.7k469175




                  53.7k469175



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43289%2fdo-i-really-need-to-have-a-scientific-explanation-for-my-premise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

                      Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

                      Compiling documents onlineAre any web base TEX editors with live collaboration available?Is there a web-based LaTeX or TeX editor?Creating a PDF file online from a LaTeX templateAre there any online LaTeX editors that provide the latest packages?Comparison of browser-based latex processorsCan I find something like this online?Is there a site where I can enter a latex expression, and it shows me an image of the compiled expression?Automatic online compiling systemA resource for converting LaTeX within the browserIs there an equivalent of jsfiddle for LaTeX?Online LaTeX syntax highlighterComparison of browser-based latex processorsDo the online LaTeX compilers use a TeX daemon to speed up their compilation?Undefined control sequence documentclassLaTeX Syntax Highlighting in Google DriveWhy are my Latex compile times varying massively?Online compilation with commercial fontsCompiling multiple LaTeX filesSlow compiling of large documents in TeXstudiodocument not compiling with custom .cls