Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?Need a resource for creative writingWhy do heroes need to have a physical mark?Do you need to have your major plot point established in the first few chapters?Do you need to have an introduction at the beginning of every book in a series?How to write without the need for filtering and wordiness?Do I need to have a degree to become a writer?Effectively conveying an unreliable narratorIs it true that writers don't really need agents and they can just query publishers directly, as Dean Wesley Smith says?Is a nuclear apocalypse cliche?Write for an audience or find an audience for your writing?
Is it possible that a question has only two answers?
Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?
PTIJ: Why does only a Shor Tam ask at the Seder, and not a Shor Mu'ad?
How does Ehrenfest's theorem apply to the quantum harmonic oscillator?
Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?
How to design an organic heat-shield?
Trouble making an executable as a service
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?
Signed and unsigned numbers
Gaining more land
Getting the || sign while using Kurier
What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?
MySQL importing CSV files really slow
Making a kiddush for a girl that has hard time finding shidduch
Nylon switch cover plate screws
This Alpine town?
What are you allowed to do while using the Warlock's Eldritch Master feature?
What was the motivation for developing the plugin API?
Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?
Can we track matter through time by looking at different depths in space?
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Shifting between bemols and diesis in the key signature
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?
Need a resource for creative writingWhy do heroes need to have a physical mark?Do you need to have your major plot point established in the first few chapters?Do you need to have an introduction at the beginning of every book in a series?How to write without the need for filtering and wordiness?Do I need to have a degree to become a writer?Effectively conveying an unreliable narratorIs it true that writers don't really need agents and they can just query publishers directly, as Dean Wesley Smith says?Is a nuclear apocalypse cliche?Write for an audience or find an audience for your writing?
So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.
And that is not science.
I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.
But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?
creative-writing readers
|
show 2 more comments
So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.
And that is not science.
I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.
But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?
creative-writing readers
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
3
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
2
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.
And that is not science.
I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.
But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?
creative-writing readers
So, in my post-apocalyptic novel, the world was caught up in an international war (basically WWIII), and all the world's nuclear superpowers launched their warheads and killed much of the global population. Ambient radiation from the nuclear fallout has caused humans to develop supernatural abilities.
And that is not science.
I totally get that radiation just hurts/kills people, it doesn't give someone the ability to manipulate life force or become pyrokinetic like I assert in my story. That's not scientifically possible.
But does my story need to be scientifically accurate or plausible? Will I lose readers because all they can think of is "that would never happen"? Can a story like mine with inaccurate/nonexistent science still be appealing?
creative-writing readers
creative-writing readers
asked 3 hours ago
weakdnaweakdna
2,92631857
2,92631857
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
3
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
2
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
3
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
2
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
3
3
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
2
2
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...
If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.
I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.
Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D
There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.
add a comment |
No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)
That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.
Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43289%2fdo-i-really-need-to-have-a-scientific-explanation-for-my-premise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...
If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.
I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.
Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D
There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.
add a comment |
Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...
If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.
I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.
Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D
There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.
add a comment |
Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...
If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.
I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.
Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D
There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.
Spiderman was bitten by a spider and developed spider-like abilities. Superman is from a different planet and afraid of a glowing rock, even if this human-like creature can shoot lasers from his eyes. The Incredible Hulk is... Hulk...
If you are looking for a non-comic example take a look at the Metro series. Post-apocalpyse after the nuclear war. Everywhere there are creepy mutants wandering around and people are living from pigs and mushrooms in the Moscow Metro. When reading it I wasn't thinking about realism - I was thinking about the interesting story and what the auther did with this unrealistic premise.
I could list dozens of books I have read that don't have a realistic premise. Especially once you introduce superpowers nobody will care. Your readers are not the ones to complain about non-realistic stuff if that is your premise. Nobody can force you to stick to reality.
Heck, I am currently reading something about a great war between dwarves and dragon-riding elves. My dragon army will grill your "physics" :D
There are lots of genres out there that don't care a bit about realism. Post-apocalypse radiation superheroes are definitely in one of those.
answered 3 hours ago
SecespitusSecespitus
6,87923169
6,87923169
add a comment |
add a comment |
No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)
That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.
Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.
add a comment |
No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)
That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.
Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.
add a comment |
No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)
That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.
Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.
No, people won't say that, not even full time working scientists (like me). I know a great deal about genetics, I've published academic articles about it. That did not prevent me from enjoying the TV series "Heros" for several seasons. Supposedly their super-powers were due to "genetic mutations" (including immortality, time-travel, psychokinesis, irresistible "command" voice, fire-starting, invisibility, etc.)
That's B.S. to the power of infinity, but I get it, you need an explanation for your fantasy universe, and "Radiation" and "genes" are a stock answer, like "quantum" anything.
Personally, I'd embrace the magic. You are writing a fantasy, and in fantasy magic generally exists without explanation (rules of magic are common, magic systems are common, but where the actual "magic" comes from is just an assertion that something exists, like "life force", or "the force" in Star Wars, or whatever). You can do the same; just use your imagination and make something up. Meaning, the radiation isn't causing genetic mutations, it just released some kind of magic into the world and now some people are learning to use it. Maybe all the magic was used up, and now (due to the nuclear explosions) there is a fresh supply of it.
answered 2 hours ago
AmadeusAmadeus
53.7k469175
53.7k469175
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43289%2fdo-i-really-need-to-have-a-scientific-explanation-for-my-premise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is this not a valid question? Why so many downvotes? Anyone care to explain?
– weakdna
3 hours ago
3
Of course you will lose some potential readers, because you lose potential readers with every choice you make. But I cannot imagine why you would even ask something like this when the most popular sci-fi franchises today have endless amounts of fantastical elements without any hint at a scientific explanation. (To further explain my downvote, the question is opinion-based and, in my opinion, nonsensical.)
– Spectrosaurus
3 hours ago
@Spectrosaurus I've gotten multiple critiques about a lack of scientific explanation, so I asked it on here.
– weakdna
3 hours ago
This really is a valid question. Many questions seem obvious to the answerer.
– bruglesco
3 hours ago
2
If you've gotten such critique you should review your critique group and the way you market your book. Do you make it obvious to the beta readers that you are writing a non-scientific post-apocalypse superhero fantasy novel? Maybe they just expect something different or are used to some different genre.
– Secespitus
3 hours ago