Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Either or Neither in sentence with another negative

Theorems that impeded progress

Today is the Center

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

Collect Fourier series terms

Characters won't fit in table

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?



Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?


Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?













1












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    1 hour ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$







complexity-theory






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

262




262




New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



$A (i)$



  1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

  2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "419"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



    $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



    $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



    Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



    $A (i)$



    1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

    2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

    This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



      $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



      $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



      Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



      $A (i)$



      1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

      2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

      This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$



        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$

        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 1 hour ago









        Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

        262




        262




        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

            Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

            Are small insurances worth itIs insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?Is accident insurance worth it for my kids who play sportsIs insuring property for more than it is worth allowed?At what point does it become worth it to file an insurance claim?Are wage loss insurance programs worth the cost compared to having an emergency fund?When is an event worth insuring against?Is insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?FHA loan just commenced : Any way to get any of the up-front mortgage insurance back?Which types of insurances do I need to buy?Should I carry less renter's insurance if I can self-insure?Mortgage Adviser Signed Me Up For Multiple Home and Life Insurances (UK)Why many travel insurances don't cover country of nationality?