What was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWere there 8086 coprocessors other than the 8087?What was the first CPU with exposed pipeline?What's the relationship between early 90s Pentium microprocessor and today's Intel designs?Is there any reason to chose ES, FS, or GS over the others in real mode?How do you put a 286 in Protected Mode?Why not use fractions instead of floating point?Which pre-IEEE computers had a single precision FPU and implemented double precision floats in software?How did the 8086 interface with the 8087 FPU coprocessor?How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?What can an 8086 CPU do if an x87 floating-point coprocessor is attached to it?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Falsification in Math vs Science

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

Worn-tile Scrabble

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

How to type this arrow in math mode?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Why did Peik say, "I'm not an animal"?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How to add class in ko template in magento2

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Short story: man watches girlfriend's spaceship entering a 'black hole' (?) forever

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?



What was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWere there 8086 coprocessors other than the 8087?What was the first CPU with exposed pipeline?What's the relationship between early 90s Pentium microprocessor and today's Intel designs?Is there any reason to chose ES, FS, or GS over the others in real mode?How do you put a 286 in Protected Mode?Why not use fractions instead of floating point?Which pre-IEEE computers had a single precision FPU and implemented double precision floats in software?How did the 8086 interface with the 8087 FPU coprocessor?How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?What can an 8086 CPU do if an x87 floating-point coprocessor is attached to it?










1















This Wikipedia page says the following:




Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU




So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    1















    This Wikipedia page says the following:




    Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
    instructions implemented in the main CPU




    So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



    But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      1












      1








      1








      This Wikipedia page says the following:




      Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
      instructions implemented in the main CPU




      So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



      But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      This Wikipedia page says the following:




      Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
      instructions implemented in the main CPU




      So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.



      But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?







      history intel floating-point cpu x86






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      manassehkatz

      3,132625




      3,132625






      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      user12280user12280

      232




      232




      New contributor




      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



          Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



          In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



          I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.




          * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






          share|improve this answer























          • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            35 mins ago


















          2














          As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "648"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.




            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer























            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              35 mins ago















            2














            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.




            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer























            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              35 mins ago













            2












            2








            2







            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.




            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug






            share|improve this answer













            All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).



            Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.



            In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.



            I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.




            * for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            KazKaz

            2,456942




            2,456942












            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              35 mins ago

















            • Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

              – Stephen Kitt
              35 mins ago
















            Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            35 mins ago





            Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.

            – Stephen Kitt
            35 mins ago











            2














            As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






            share|improve this answer





























              2














              As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






              share|improve this answer



























                2












                2








                2







                As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.






                share|improve this answer















                As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 50 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Stephen KittStephen Kitt

                40k8163173




                40k8163173




















                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

                    Lioubotyn Sommaire Géographie | Histoire | Population | Notes et références | Liens externes | Menu de navigationlubotin.kharkov.uamodifier« Recensements et estimations de la population depuis 1897 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2010, 2011 et 2012 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2011, 2012 et 2013 »Informations officiellesCartes topographiquesCarte routièrem

                    Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm