Gdtyjr

Geography at the pixel level

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Is bread bad for ducks?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Is it correct to say the Neural Networks are an alternative way of performing Maximum Likelihood Estimation? if not, why?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

How to translate "being like"?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

Worn-tile Scrabble

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?

What is this business jet?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Flight paths in orbit around Ceres?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a “canonical” specification of the naturals?

0

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+xelatex? Compiling the example

documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackagemicrotype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
 range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
 Extension=.otf,
 range="2A3E,
 BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begindocument
(ℕ mathbbN BbbN symbbN)
enddocument

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the xe[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

add a comment | 

0

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+xelatex? Compiling the example

documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackagemicrotype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
 range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
 Extension=.otf,
 range="2A3E,
 BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begindocument
(ℕ mathbbN BbbN symbbN)
enddocument

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the xe[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

add a comment | 

Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+xelatex? Compiling the example

documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackagemicrotype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
 range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
 Extension=.otf,
 range="2A3E,
 BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begindocument
(ℕ mathbbN BbbN symbbN)
enddocument

with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters

ℕℕℕℕ

Moreover, is there a consensus in the xe[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?

(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)

xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard

share

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackagemicrotype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
 range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
 Extension=.otf,
 range="2A3E,
 BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begindocument
(ℕ mathbbN BbbN symbbN)
enddocument

share

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

share

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122

asked 49 secs ago

user49915user49915

759122