Chess with symmetric move-squareCopycat chess is backHow many Chess Pieces are needed to control every square on the board?Equal Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorThe Knight Checker or Football ChessFairy Chess #1- The MastermindA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Mate in one with NO PIECES?A Chess Lock Puzzle?The ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Possibly bubble sort algorithm
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
I see my dog run
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
What makes Graph invariants so useful/important?
The magic money tree problem
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"
What Brexit solution does the DUP want?
A Journey Through Space and Time
How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?
How long does it take to type this?
How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Chess with symmetric move-square
Copycat chess is backHow many Chess Pieces are needed to control every square on the board?Equal Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorThe Knight Checker or Football ChessFairy Chess #1- The MastermindA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Mate in one with NO PIECES?A Chess Lock Puzzle?The ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back
$begingroup$
Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.
In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.
What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?
Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?
Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?
chess checkerboard knight-moves
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.
In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.
What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?
Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?
Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?
chess checkerboard knight-moves
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.
In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.
What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?
Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?
Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?
chess checkerboard knight-moves
New contributor
$endgroup$
Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.
In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.
What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?
Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?
Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?
chess checkerboard knight-moves
chess checkerboard knight-moves
New contributor
New contributor
edited 27 mins ago
Brandon_J
3,558244
3,558244
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Artem LuginArtem Lugin
112
112
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Partial (will update as I go)
R x R
This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting
1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5
Apronus link
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Under your rules, here are my answers.
Rook X Rook:
1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Knight X Rook:
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Queen X Bishop:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4
Proof Game:
Apronus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Partial (will update as I go)
R x R
This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting
1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5
Apronus link
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial (will update as I go)
R x R
This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting
1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5
Apronus link
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Partial (will update as I go)
R x R
This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting
1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5
Apronus link
$endgroup$
Partial (will update as I go)
R x R
This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting
1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5
Apronus link
answered 51 mins ago
PiIsNot3PiIsNot3
1,772124
1,772124
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Under your rules, here are my answers.
Rook X Rook:
1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Knight X Rook:
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Queen X Bishop:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4
Proof Game:
Apronus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Under your rules, here are my answers.
Rook X Rook:
1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Knight X Rook:
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Queen X Bishop:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4
Proof Game:
Apronus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Under your rules, here are my answers.
Rook X Rook:
1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Knight X Rook:
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Queen X Bishop:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4
Proof Game:
Apronus
$endgroup$
Under your rules, here are my answers.
Rook X Rook:
1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Knight X Rook:
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8
Proof Game:
Apronus
Queen X Bishop:
1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4
Proof Game:
Apronus
edited 35 mins ago
Brandon_J
3,558244
3,558244
answered 49 mins ago
Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay
56615
56615
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
43 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
17 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
3 mins ago
|
show 4 more comments
Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
56 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
42 mins ago