Concept of linear mappings are confusing meChange of Basis ConfusionProve that a linear map for complex polynomials is diagonalizableEigenvalues of three given linear operatorsTransforming coordinate system vs objectsCan an $ntimes n$ matrix be reduced to a smaller matrix in any sense?Overview of Linear AlgebraLinear Transformation vs MatrixPruning SubsetsChange of basis formula - intuition/is this true?Linear Algebra:Vector Space

Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).

Possibly bubble sort algorithm

declaring a variable twice in IIFE

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

Patience, young "Padovan"

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

N.B. ligature in Latex

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

How do I create uniquely male characters?

A Journey Through Space and Time

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

Example of a relative pronoun

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Should I join office cleaning event for free?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?



Concept of linear mappings are confusing me


Change of Basis ConfusionProve that a linear map for complex polynomials is diagonalizableEigenvalues of three given linear operatorsTransforming coordinate system vs objectsCan an $ntimes n$ matrix be reduced to a smaller matrix in any sense?Overview of Linear AlgebraLinear Transformation vs MatrixPruning SubsetsChange of basis formula - intuition/is this true?Linear Algebra:Vector Space













5












$begingroup$


I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    51 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    39 mins ago
















5












$begingroup$


I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    51 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    39 mins ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.



Thanks!







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 54 mins ago









mingming

4306




4306







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    51 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    39 mins ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    51 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
    $endgroup$
    – John Douma
    39 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
51 mins ago




$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
51 mins ago












$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
39 mins ago





$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
39 mins ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.



You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbbR^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbbR^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$



Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
beginbmatrix
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
endbmatrix
beginbmatrix
1 \
2 \
3
endbmatrix
=
beginbmatrix
5\
11
endbmatrix.
$$



You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.



    So it will map a line to a line or $0$, a plane to a plane, a line, or $0$, and so on.



    By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179032%2fconcept-of-linear-mappings-are-confusing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.



      You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbbR^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbbR^2$ this way, for example:
      $$
      (x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
      $$



      Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
      $$
      beginbmatrix
      2 & 0 & 1 \
      3 & 4 & 0
      endbmatrix
      beginbmatrix
      1 \
      2 \
      3
      endbmatrix
      =
      beginbmatrix
      5\
      11
      endbmatrix.
      $$



      You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.



        You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbbR^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbbR^2$ this way, for example:
        $$
        (x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
        $$



        Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
        $$
        beginbmatrix
        2 & 0 & 1 \
        3 & 4 & 0
        endbmatrix
        beginbmatrix
        1 \
        2 \
        3
        endbmatrix
        =
        beginbmatrix
        5\
        11
        endbmatrix.
        $$



        You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.



          You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbbR^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbbR^2$ this way, for example:
          $$
          (x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
          $$



          Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
          $$
          beginbmatrix
          2 & 0 & 1 \
          3 & 4 & 0
          endbmatrix
          beginbmatrix
          1 \
          2 \
          3
          endbmatrix
          =
          beginbmatrix
          5\
          11
          endbmatrix.
          $$



          You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.



          You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbbR^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbbR^2$ this way, for example:
          $$
          (x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
          $$



          Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
          $$
          beginbmatrix
          2 & 0 & 1 \
          3 & 4 & 0
          endbmatrix
          beginbmatrix
          1 \
          2 \
          3
          endbmatrix
          =
          beginbmatrix
          5\
          11
          endbmatrix.
          $$



          You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 39 mins ago









          Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker

          45.8k553120




          45.8k553120





















              0












              $begingroup$

              A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.



              So it will map a line to a line or $0$, a plane to a plane, a line, or $0$, and so on.



              By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.



                So it will map a line to a line or $0$, a plane to a plane, a line, or $0$, and so on.



                By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.



                  So it will map a line to a line or $0$, a plane to a plane, a line, or $0$, and so on.



                  By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.



                  So it will map a line to a line or $0$, a plane to a plane, a line, or $0$, and so on.



                  By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 30 mins ago









                  rschwiebrschwieb

                  108k12103253




                  108k12103253



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179032%2fconcept-of-linear-mappings-are-confusing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

                      Lioubotyn Sommaire Géographie | Histoire | Population | Notes et références | Liens externes | Menu de navigationlubotin.kharkov.uamodifier« Recensements et estimations de la population depuis 1897 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2010, 2011 et 2012 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2011, 2012 et 2013 »Informations officiellesCartes topographiquesCarte routièrem

                      Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm