Gdtyjr

Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA

Circuit Analysis: Obtaining Close Loop OP - AMP Transfer function

What is Cash Advance APR?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

How much of a Devil Fruit must be consumed to gain the power?

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

Will the Sticky MAC access policy prevent unauthorized hubs from connecting to a network?

Multiplicative persistence

Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Why should universal income be universal?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

A Trivial Diagnosis

C++ copy constructor called at return

Permission on Database

PTIJ: Why is Haman obsessed with Bose?

Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram

What do you call a word that can be spelled forward or backward forming two different words

Non-trope happy ending?

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

In a multiple cat home, how many litter boxes should you have?

15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?

Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

Is AES-256 weaker than 192 and 128 bit versions?Difference between Rijndael 128 / 256 blocksize implementations? (and impact of block size in general)What is the security loss from reducing Rijndael to 128 bits block size from 256 bits?Does AES-128 have the same strength as AES-256 with a padded key?What are the constraints on using GCM with a tag size of 96 and 128 bits?AES - What is the advantage of a 256-bit key with a 128-bit block cipher?AES key and block sizeIs there any compelling or logical reason to use AES-192 over AES-128 but not use AES-256?Are tags longer than 128 bit possible for AES-256-CCM and AES-256-GCM?AES key expansion for 192-bit

5

$begingroup$

I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:

*128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
*192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
*256-bit key size -> 14 rounds

Why these specific numbers of rounds only?

aes

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

5

$begingroup$

I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:

*128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
*192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
*256-bit key size -> 14 rounds

Why these specific numbers of rounds only?

aes

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I was reading about the AES algorithm to be used in one of our projects and found that the exact number of rounds is fixed in AES for specific key sizes:

*128-bit key size -> 10 rounds
*192-bit key size -> 12 rounds
*256-bit key size -> 14 rounds

Why these specific numbers of rounds only?

aes

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

edited 26 mins ago

forest

4,44511641

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

New contributor

kapil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 2 hours ago

kapilkapil

282

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

$begingroup$

Why these specific number of rounds only?

Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".

The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.

Why not more or less?

The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.

Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.

To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):

For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:

1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.




2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "281"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

kapil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68199%2fwhy-does-aes-have-exactly-10-rounds-for-a-128-bit-key-12-for-192-bits-and-14-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

5

$begingroup$

Why these specific number of rounds only?

Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".

The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.

Why not more or less?

The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.

Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.

To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):

For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:

1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.




2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

5

$begingroup$

Why these specific number of rounds only?

Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".

The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.

Why not more or less?

The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.

Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.

To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):

For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:

1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.




2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Why these specific number of rounds only?

Because AES is a standard; AES is an acronym for "Advanced Encryption Standard".

The standard specifies these specific number of rounds to ensure that different implementations are interoperable.

Why not more or less?

The reason these specific numbers of rounds were chosen was a choice of the designers. They did a lot of math to determine that these were the sweet spot between sufficient security and optimal performance.

Less might be insecure, and more might be slower with no benefit.

To quote the above book (from Section 3.5 The Number of Rounds):

For Rijndael versions with a longer key, the number of rounds was raised by one for every additional 32 bits in the cipher key. This was done for the following reasons:

1. One of the main objectives is the absence of shortcut attacks, i.e. attacks that are more efficient than an exhaustive key search. Since the workload of an exhaustive key search grows with the key length, shortcut attacks can afford to be less efficient for longer keys.




2. (Partially) known-key and related-key attacks exploit the knowledge of cipher key bits or the ability to apply different cipher keys. If the cipher key grows, the range of possibilities available to the cryptanalyst increases.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

edited 1 hour ago

puzzlepalace

2,8701133

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281

answered 2 hours ago

Ella Rose♦Ella Rose

16.5k44281