apalike bibliography changes to numbers suddenlyDisplaying BibTeX item in References without labelCreate and set the bibliographyHow to include 2 bibliographies with natbib and TeXlipseUsing apalike and natbib in Lyx with author abbreviation as indexUnsuccessful attempts at sorting the bibliography alphabetically [natbib,plainnat,citep]independent bibliographies in one documentProblem with bibliography section header and font sizeCitation aliases in BeamerInserting Bibliography from Endnote to Overleaf

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

Trocar background-image com delay via jQuery

Finding the minimum value of a function without using Calculus

Smooth vector fields on a surface modulo diffeomorphisms

PTIJ: Sport in the Torah

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?

Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Automaton recognizing ambiguously accepted words of another automaton

Idiom for feeling after taking risk and someone else being rewarded

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

(Codewars) Linked Lists-Sorted Insert

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Yet another question on sums of the reciprocals of the primes

Sampling from Gaussian mixture models, when are the sampled data independent?

Why restrict private health insurance?

How should I solve this integral with changing parameters?

Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire

apalike bibliography changes to numbers suddenly

Displaying BibTeX item in References without labelCreate and set the bibliographyHow to include 2 bibliographies with natbib and TeXlipseUsing apalike and natbib in Lyx with author abbreviation as indexUnsuccessful attempts at sorting the bibliography alphabetically [natbib,plainnat,citep]independent bibliographies in one documentProblem with bibliography section header and font sizeCitation aliases in BeamerInserting Bibliography from Endnote to Overleaf

I am using natbib package in my project, which has documentclassreport, and I am using apalike style for my bibliography. I am currently using v2.overleaf to write my document. Everything was working so far, but now when I add any more references in my document's .bib file, the citations in my document change from author, date (I mostly used citep(something), they change to numbers. It looks like there is a limit on the number of references.

I cannot seem to find what the problem is, but here is some info:

I have used 48 references so far, and adding the 49th lead to this problem (I have no idea if this is related or not)

my .bib file now has 541 lines.

I wonder if anyone has faced this problem before.

I appreciate any help guys :)

documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]report
usepackage[round]natbib

begindocument
some text here citepcitation48
some other text citepcitation49 
bibliographystyleapalike
footnotesize
bibliographylibrary.bib
enddocument

Before
enter image description here

After
enter image description here

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

1

Adding references to the .bib file shouldn't affect your document at all unless you also cite them in the document. So when you cite the 49th reference, what does the output look like? Can you edit your question to include a minimal compilable document (beginning with documentclass... and ending with enddocument that shows exactly how you are generating the bibliography? (No other packages should be needed in the example other than natbib).

– Alan Munn
Jun 25 '18 at 3:43

1

Welcome, please don't feel offense, but i guess you will get a quicker solution to your problem by getting in touch with the Overleaf help team. I guess you won't be able to make us reproduce your local problem.

– Johannes_B
Jun 25 '18 at 4:44

This is a very weird problem, the more so because the apalike bibliography style is only set up to generate authoryear-style citation call-outs. If you're getting numeric-style citation call-outs all of a sudden, something very odd must have happened. Without access to your code, it's unfortunately not possible to offer a definitive diagnosis. Real quick: did you check (a) that there's no additional bibliographystyle instruction lurking around somewhere and (b) that the natbib package isn't all of a sudden being loaded with the option numbers?

– Mico
Jun 25 '18 at 7:05

Thank you guys for the comments, I tried to follow your instructions and add some codes and screenshots. I will get in touch with overleaf to ask them, no offense taken :) there is no additional bibliographystyle, and I do not touch natbib. the only thing I change is cite another (any) citation and boom, apalike changes to numbers!

– peykaf
Jun 26 '18 at 15:03

1

The natbib documentation also says The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode. So perhaps a mal-formed entry is the problem.

– Alan Munn
Jun 26 '18 at 16:16

|
show 2 more comments

I cannot seem to find what the problem is, but here is some info:

I have used 48 references so far, and adding the 49th lead to this problem (I have no idea if this is related or not)

my .bib file now has 541 lines.

I wonder if anyone has faced this problem before.

I appreciate any help guys :)

documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]report
usepackage[round]natbib

begindocument
some text here citepcitation48
some other text citepcitation49 
bibliographystyleapalike
footnotesize
bibliographylibrary.bib
enddocument

Before
enter image description here

After
enter image description here

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

1

Adding references to the .bib file shouldn't affect your document at all unless you also cite them in the document. So when you cite the 49th reference, what does the output look like? Can you edit your question to include a minimal compilable document (beginning with documentclass... and ending with enddocument that shows exactly how you are generating the bibliography? (No other packages should be needed in the example other than natbib).

– Alan Munn
Jun 25 '18 at 3:43

1

Welcome, please don't feel offense, but i guess you will get a quicker solution to your problem by getting in touch with the Overleaf help team. I guess you won't be able to make us reproduce your local problem.

– Johannes_B
Jun 25 '18 at 4:44

This is a very weird problem, the more so because the apalike bibliography style is only set up to generate authoryear-style citation call-outs. If you're getting numeric-style citation call-outs all of a sudden, something very odd must have happened. Without access to your code, it's unfortunately not possible to offer a definitive diagnosis. Real quick: did you check (a) that there's no additional bibliographystyle instruction lurking around somewhere and (b) that the natbib package isn't all of a sudden being loaded with the option numbers?

– Mico
Jun 25 '18 at 7:05

Thank you guys for the comments, I tried to follow your instructions and add some codes and screenshots. I will get in touch with overleaf to ask them, no offense taken :) there is no additional bibliographystyle, and I do not touch natbib. the only thing I change is cite another (any) citation and boom, apalike changes to numbers!

– peykaf
Jun 26 '18 at 15:03

1

The natbib documentation also says The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode. So perhaps a mal-formed entry is the problem.

– Alan Munn
Jun 26 '18 at 16:16

|
show 2 more comments

I cannot seem to find what the problem is, but here is some info:

I have used 48 references so far, and adding the 49th lead to this problem (I have no idea if this is related or not)

my .bib file now has 541 lines.

I wonder if anyone has faced this problem before.

I appreciate any help guys :)

documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]report
usepackage[round]natbib

begindocument
some text here citepcitation48
some other text citepcitation49 
bibliographystyleapalike
footnotesize
bibliographylibrary.bib
enddocument

Before
enter image description here

After
enter image description here

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

I cannot seem to find what the problem is, but here is some info:

I have used 48 references so far, and adding the 49th lead to this problem (I have no idea if this is related or not)

my .bib file now has 541 lines.

I wonder if anyone has faced this problem before.

I appreciate any help guys :)

documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]report
usepackage[round]natbib

begindocument
some text here citepcitation48
some other text citepcitation49 
bibliographystyleapalike
footnotesize
bibliographylibrary.bib
enddocument

Before
enter image description here

After
enter image description here

bibliographies bibtex natbib apa-style

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

edited Jun 26 '18 at 15:01

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

asked Jun 25 '18 at 0:06

peykaf

133

1

Adding references to the .bib file shouldn't affect your document at all unless you also cite them in the document. So when you cite the 49th reference, what does the output look like? Can you edit your question to include a minimal compilable document (beginning with documentclass... and ending with enddocument that shows exactly how you are generating the bibliography? (No other packages should be needed in the example other than natbib).

– Alan Munn
Jun 25 '18 at 3:43

1

Welcome, please don't feel offense, but i guess you will get a quicker solution to your problem by getting in touch with the Overleaf help team. I guess you won't be able to make us reproduce your local problem.

– Johannes_B
Jun 25 '18 at 4:44

This is a very weird problem, the more so because the apalike bibliography style is only set up to generate authoryear-style citation call-outs. If you're getting numeric-style citation call-outs all of a sudden, something very odd must have happened. Without access to your code, it's unfortunately not possible to offer a definitive diagnosis. Real quick: did you check (a) that there's no additional bibliographystyle instruction lurking around somewhere and (b) that the natbib package isn't all of a sudden being loaded with the option numbers?

– Mico
Jun 25 '18 at 7:05

Thank you guys for the comments, I tried to follow your instructions and add some codes and screenshots. I will get in touch with overleaf to ask them, no offense taken :) there is no additional bibliographystyle, and I do not touch natbib. the only thing I change is cite another (any) citation and boom, apalike changes to numbers!

– peykaf
Jun 26 '18 at 15:03

1

The natbib documentation also says The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode. So perhaps a mal-formed entry is the problem.

– Alan Munn
Jun 26 '18 at 16:16

|
show 2 more comments

1

Adding references to the .bib file shouldn't affect your document at all unless you also cite them in the document. So when you cite the 49th reference, what does the output look like? Can you edit your question to include a minimal compilable document (beginning with documentclass... and ending with enddocument that shows exactly how you are generating the bibliography? (No other packages should be needed in the example other than natbib).

– Alan Munn
Jun 25 '18 at 3:43

1

Welcome, please don't feel offense, but i guess you will get a quicker solution to your problem by getting in touch with the Overleaf help team. I guess you won't be able to make us reproduce your local problem.

– Johannes_B
Jun 25 '18 at 4:44

This is a very weird problem, the more so because the apalike bibliography style is only set up to generate authoryear-style citation call-outs. If you're getting numeric-style citation call-outs all of a sudden, something very odd must have happened. Without access to your code, it's unfortunately not possible to offer a definitive diagnosis. Real quick: did you check (a) that there's no additional bibliographystyle instruction lurking around somewhere and (b) that the natbib package isn't all of a sudden being loaded with the option numbers?

– Mico
Jun 25 '18 at 7:05

Thank you guys for the comments, I tried to follow your instructions and add some codes and screenshots. I will get in touch with overleaf to ask them, no offense taken :) there is no additional bibliographystyle, and I do not touch natbib. the only thing I change is cite another (any) citation and boom, apalike changes to numbers!

– peykaf
Jun 26 '18 at 15:03

1

The natbib documentation also says The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode. So perhaps a mal-formed entry is the problem.

– Alan Munn
Jun 26 '18 at 16:16

Adding references to the .bib file shouldn't affect your document at all unless you also cite them in the document. So when you cite the 49th reference, what does the output look like? Can you edit your question to include a minimal compilable document (beginning with documentclass... and ending with enddocument that shows exactly how you are generating the bibliography? (No other packages should be needed in the example other than natbib).

– Alan Munn
Jun 25 '18 at 3:43

Welcome, please don't feel offense, but i guess you will get a quicker solution to your problem by getting in touch with the Overleaf help team. I guess you won't be able to make us reproduce your local problem.

– Johannes_B
Jun 25 '18 at 4:44

This is a very weird problem, the more so because the apalike bibliography style is only set up to generate authoryear-style citation call-outs. If you're getting numeric-style citation call-outs all of a sudden, something very odd must have happened. Without access to your code, it's unfortunately not possible to offer a definitive diagnosis. Real quick: did you check (a) that there's no additional bibliographystyle instruction lurking around somewhere and (b) that the natbib package isn't all of a sudden being loaded with the option numbers?

– Mico
Jun 25 '18 at 7:05

Thank you guys for the comments, I tried to follow your instructions and add some codes and screenshots. I will get in touch with overleaf to ask them, no offense taken :) there is no additional bibliographystyle, and I do not touch natbib. the only thing I change is cite another (any) citation and boom, apalike changes to numbers!

– peykaf
Jun 26 '18 at 15:03

The natbib documentation also says The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode. So perhaps a mal-formed entry is the problem.

– Alan Munn
Jun 26 '18 at 16:16

|
show 2 more comments

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

The natbib documentation states:

The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode.

It does this only after generating an error:

! Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.

(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.

Unfortunately, online LaTeX systems like ShareLaTeX and Overleaf do everything they can to produce some output and try to push through errors wherever they can. This problem is compounded by the fact that there is no simple way to view the error log without downloading it (last time I checked). For example, if you have the following .bib file entry, namely an item with an author but no year, and you push through the error, the bibliography will be generated using the numeric system. From your comment it seems that something of this sort is what happened.

@miscFoo2018,
 Author = Foo,
 Howpublished = Unpublished manuscript,
 Title = A title

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f437831%2fapalike-bibliography-changes-to-numbers-suddenly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

The natbib documentation states:

The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode.

It does this only after generating an error:

! Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.

(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.

@miscFoo2018,
 Author = Foo,
 Howpublished = Unpublished manuscript,
 Title = A title

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

add a comment |

The natbib documentation states:

The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode.

It does this only after generating an error:

! Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.

(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.

@miscFoo2018,
 Author = Foo,
 Howpublished = Unpublished manuscript,
 Title = A title

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

add a comment |

The natbib documentation states:

The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode.

It does this only after generating an error:

! Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.

(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.

@miscFoo2018,
 Author = Foo,
 Howpublished = Unpublished manuscript,
 Title = A title

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

The natbib documentation states:

The natbib package will automatically switch to numerical mode if any one of the bibitem entries fails to conform to the possible author–year formats. There is no way to override this, since such an entry would cause trouble in the author–year mode.

It does this only after generating an error:

! Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.

(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.

@miscFoo2018,
 Author = Foo,
 Howpublished = Unpublished manuscript,
 Title = A title

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

answered Jun 26 '18 at 17:30

Alan Munn

162k28431706

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

add a comment |

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

That was exactly the case! I really appreciate your assistance Alan.

– peykaf
Jun 27 '18 at 19:40

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Gdtyjr

1 Answer
1

Your Answer

Post as a guest

1 Answer
1

1 Answer
1

Post as a guest

Popular posts from this blog

Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm

1 Answer 1

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Post as a guest

1 Answer 1

1 Answer 1

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Popular posts from this blog

Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm

1 Answer
1

1 Answer
1

1 Answer
1