Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Contract necessary for the most basic processing under GPDR?Under the GDPR, should transaction data be deleted on account deletion or on user request?GDPR impact on genealogy website / uncontrolled user dataWill GDPR (EU law) make bad practices in security illegal?Does GDPR apply to internal employees data?Does keeping an MD5 hash of user data violate GDPR?GDPR and personal data that gets crawled and ends up on other websitesGDPR - is user social ID personal dataDoes my Personal Web App need to comply to GDPR?Replication of user data a violation of GDPR
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
Magento 2 - Add additional attributes in register
RM anova or Factorial Anova?
Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options
Centre cell vertically in tabularx across multiple multiline rows
malloc in main() or malloc in another function: allocating memory for a struct and its members
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
How did 'ликвиди́ровать' semantically shift to mean 'abolish' and 'destroy, kill'?
Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?
Who's this lady in the war room?
Do British people often use the word lightning conductor?
Unicode symbols with XeLaTeX and Lato font
Is honorific speech ever used in the first person?
Can I cut the hair of a conjured korred with a blade made of precious material to harvest that material from the korred?
My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Alternative of "Rest In Peace" (RIP)
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?
How can I list files in reverse time order by a command and pass them as arguments to another command?
Reflections in a Square
How to achieve cat-like agility?
Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?
Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?
Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Contract necessary for the most basic processing under GPDR?Under the GDPR, should transaction data be deleted on account deletion or on user request?GDPR impact on genealogy website / uncontrolled user dataWill GDPR (EU law) make bad practices in security illegal?Does GDPR apply to internal employees data?Does keeping an MD5 hash of user data violate GDPR?GDPR and personal data that gets crawled and ends up on other websitesGDPR - is user social ID personal dataDoes my Personal Web App need to comply to GDPR?Replication of user data a violation of GDPR
I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.
A lot of the data is also inaccurate.
Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:
- does the GDPR applies to them?
- does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?
- What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?
gdpr
add a comment |
I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.
A lot of the data is also inaccurate.
Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:
- does the GDPR applies to them?
- does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?
- What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?
gdpr
add a comment |
I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.
A lot of the data is also inaccurate.
Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:
- does the GDPR applies to them?
- does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?
- What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?
gdpr
I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.
A lot of the data is also inaccurate.
Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:
- does the GDPR applies to them?
- does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?
- What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?
gdpr
gdpr
asked 2 hours ago
ThomasThomas
1413
1413
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.
Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.
But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:
- a right to access, to see all the data they have about you
- a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you
- a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out
- a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)
These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.
If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39322%2fdoes-gdpr-cover-the-collection-of-data-by-websites-that-crawl-the-web-and-resell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.
Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.
But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:
- a right to access, to see all the data they have about you
- a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you
- a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out
- a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)
These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.
If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
add a comment |
The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.
Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.
But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:
- a right to access, to see all the data they have about you
- a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you
- a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out
- a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)
These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.
If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
add a comment |
The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.
Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.
But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:
- a right to access, to see all the data they have about you
- a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you
- a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out
- a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)
These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.
If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.
The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.
Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.
But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:
- a right to access, to see all the data they have about you
- a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you
- a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out
- a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)
These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.
If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.
answered 1 hour ago
amonamon
98816
98816
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
add a comment |
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
"For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?
– Ave
14 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
@Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.
– amon
10 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39322%2fdoes-gdpr-cover-the-collection-of-data-by-websites-that-crawl-the-web-and-resell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown