Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Contract necessary for the most basic processing under GPDR?Under the GDPR, should transaction data be deleted on account deletion or on user request?GDPR impact on genealogy website / uncontrolled user dataWill GDPR (EU law) make bad practices in security illegal?Does GDPR apply to internal employees data?Does keeping an MD5 hash of user data violate GDPR?GDPR and personal data that gets crawled and ends up on other websitesGDPR - is user social ID personal dataDoes my Personal Web App need to comply to GDPR?Replication of user data a violation of GDPR

Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?

Magento 2 - Add additional attributes in register

RM anova or Factorial Anova?

Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options

Centre cell vertically in tabularx across multiple multiline rows

malloc in main() or malloc in another function: allocating memory for a struct and its members

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

How did 'ликвиди́ровать' semantically shift to mean 'abolish' and 'destroy, kill'?

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

Who's this lady in the war room?

Do British people often use the word lightning conductor?

Unicode symbols with XeLaTeX and Lato font

Is honorific speech ever used in the first person?

Can I cut the hair of a conjured korred with a blade made of precious material to harvest that material from the korred?

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Alternative of "Rest In Peace" (RIP)

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?

How can I list files in reverse time order by a command and pass them as arguments to another command?

Reflections in a Square

How to achieve cat-like agility?

Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?



Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Contract necessary for the most basic processing under GPDR?Under the GDPR, should transaction data be deleted on account deletion or on user request?GDPR impact on genealogy website / uncontrolled user dataWill GDPR (EU law) make bad practices in security illegal?Does GDPR apply to internal employees data?Does keeping an MD5 hash of user data violate GDPR?GDPR and personal data that gets crawled and ends up on other websitesGDPR - is user social ID personal dataDoes my Personal Web App need to comply to GDPR?Replication of user data a violation of GDPR










1















I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.



A lot of the data is also inaccurate.



Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:



  • does the GDPR applies to them?

  • does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?

  • What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?









share|improve this question


























    1















    I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
    I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.



    A lot of the data is also inaccurate.



    Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:



    • does the GDPR applies to them?

    • does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?

    • What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?









    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1


      1






      I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
      I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.



      A lot of the data is also inaccurate.



      Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:



      • does the GDPR applies to them?

      • does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?

      • What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?









      share|improve this question














      I have found that a lot of my personal info is now available on a bunch of websites that collect data and resell it.
      I'm talking about those 'find anything about anyone' websites.



      A lot of the data is also inaccurate.



      Since a lot of these companies are American and I have lived my life half US / half EU and I'm now an EU resident, I was wondering:



      • does the GDPR applies to them?

      • does the GDPR applies to data they claim was 'public', but I see that this is not really true?

      • What's the responsibility of search engines, like Google, in indexing and promoting that content. As they seem to have a 'contact the webmaster' approach to it, is it possible to get the content (at the minimum the inacurate one) removed from their index?






      gdpr






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      ThomasThomas

      1413




      1413




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.



          Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.



          But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:



          • a right to access, to see all the data they have about you

          • a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you

          • a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out

          • a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)

          These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.



          If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.






          share|improve this answer























          • "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

            – Ave
            14 mins ago











          • @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

            – amon
            10 mins ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "617"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39322%2fdoes-gdpr-cover-the-collection-of-data-by-websites-that-crawl-the-web-and-resell%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.



          Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.



          But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:



          • a right to access, to see all the data they have about you

          • a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you

          • a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out

          • a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)

          These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.



          If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.






          share|improve this answer























          • "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

            – Ave
            14 mins ago











          • @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

            – amon
            10 mins ago
















          3














          The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.



          Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.



          But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:



          • a right to access, to see all the data they have about you

          • a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you

          • a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out

          • a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)

          These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.



          If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.






          share|improve this answer























          • "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

            – Ave
            14 mins ago











          • @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

            – amon
            10 mins ago














          3












          3








          3







          The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.



          Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.



          But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:



          • a right to access, to see all the data they have about you

          • a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you

          • a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out

          • a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)

          These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.



          If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.






          share|improve this answer













          The GDPR applies to such sites if they offer services in the EU/EEA. If they clearly wanted to avoid being subject to the GDPR, they should block visitors from the EEA. For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant.



          Personal data does not turn non-personal just because it was public. So the GDPR still applies when the data was collected from public sources. However, the data controller (who determines the purpose of processing) often has to balance your rights and interests against other interests (e.g. when using legitimate interest as a legal basis for some processing). For the purpose of publicly displaying your data, only showing data that was already public anyway makes it easier to argue that this is fine.



          But when the GDPR applies, you have data subject rights. Relevant rights include:



          • a right to access, to see all the data they have about you

          • a right to rectification, to correct wrong data they hold about you

          • a right to restriction, effectively an opt-out

          • a right to erasure (also known as the right to be forgotten)

          These rights apply both against the website and against Google Search (arguably, both are doing the exact same thing). Google correctly points out that they can't remove information from the Web, but they can hide information from search results.



          If you feel that your requests have not been resolved correctly, you can issue a complaint with your country's data protection authority. In theory you can also sue them. In practice, GDPR enforcement against overseas data controllers can be quite difficult and has not yet happened.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          amonamon

          98816




          98816












          • "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

            – Ave
            14 mins ago











          • @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

            – amon
            10 mins ago


















          • "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

            – Ave
            14 mins ago











          • @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

            – amon
            10 mins ago

















          "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

          – Ave
          14 mins ago





          "For the GDPR, only location matters. Other concerns like residence or citizenship are generally irrelevant." I remember reading otherwise. Can you back up this claim with sources?

          – Ave
          14 mins ago













          @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

          – amon
          10 mins ago






          @Ave this is a very common misconception about the GDPR. But the EU cannot make extraterritorial laws, so Art 3 “Territorial Scope” limits the applicability to cases where the data controller is in the EU, or where the data controller offers services in the EU, or where the data controller observes behaviour of data subjects who are currently in the EU. But e.g. a EU citizen visiting the US is not protected by the GDPR.

          – amon
          10 mins ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39322%2fdoes-gdpr-cover-the-collection-of-data-by-websites-that-crawl-the-web-and-resell%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lioubotyn Sommaire Géographie | Histoire | Population | Notes et références | Liens externes | Menu de navigationlubotin.kharkov.uamodifier« Recensements et estimations de la population depuis 1897 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2010, 2011 et 2012 »« Office des statistiques d'Ukraine : population au 1er janvier 2011, 2012 et 2013 »Informations officiellesCartes topographiquesCarte routièrem

          Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

          Mpande kaSenzangakhona Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifierMpande kaSenzangakhonavoir la liste des auteursm