Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?

Can I throw a sword that doesn't have the Thrown property at someone?

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

What is the largest species of polychaete?

Limit for e and 1/e

Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

Problem when applying foreach loop

Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?

Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Estimate capacitor parameters

What's the difference between (size_t)-1 and ~0?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Two different pronunciation of "понял"

Simulating Exploding Dice

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

Communication vs. Technical skills ,which is more relevant for today's QA engineer positions?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Make it rain characters

How to rotate it perfectly?



Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDoes the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















9















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago













9












9








9








A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.







c++






share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Fomar putesFomar putes

483




483




New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago

















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    2 hours ago
















I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago





I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





share|improve this answer























  • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    37 mins ago


















1














The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      37 mins ago















    4














    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer























    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      37 mins ago













    4












    4








    4







    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





    share|improve this answer













    The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




    To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




    std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


    Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



    auto values = /* some container */;
    auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
    ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
    [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    Ben Chaliah AyoubBen Chaliah Ayoub

    2,422217




    2,422217












    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      37 mins ago

















    • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      37 mins ago
















    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    37 mins ago





    Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    37 mins ago













    1














    The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






        share|improve this answer













        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Davis HerringDavis Herring

        9,1001736




        9,1001736




















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Isabella Eugénie Boyer Biographie | Références | Menu de navigationmodifiermodifier le codeComparator to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount – 1774 to Present.

            Join wedge with single bond in chemfigHow to make only one part of double bond bold with chemfig?Crossing bonds in chemfigjoining atoms in chemfig. Two adjacent molculesHow do I selectively change bond length in chemfig?Ugly bond joints in chemfigchemfig: reaction above arrowUsing the mhchem and chemfig packages in conjunctionBonding to specific element letter using chemfigResonance hybrids in chemfigScale chemfig molecule in beamer with tikzWhy does this chemfig bond with a hook start in the middle of the atom?

            Are small insurances worth itIs insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?Is accident insurance worth it for my kids who play sportsIs insuring property for more than it is worth allowed?At what point does it become worth it to file an insurance claim?Are wage loss insurance programs worth the cost compared to having an emergency fund?When is an event worth insuring against?Is insurance worth it if you can afford to replace the item? If not, when is it?FHA loan just commenced : Any way to get any of the up-front mortgage insurance back?Which types of insurances do I need to buy?Should I carry less renter's insurance if I can self-insure?Mortgage Adviser Signed Me Up For Multiple Home and Life Insurances (UK)Why many travel insurances don't cover country of nationality?