Notation for two qubit composite product state Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Compute average value of two-qubit systemWhat can I deduce about $f(x)$ if $f$ is balanced or constant?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How do I show that a two-qubit state is an entangled state?How is a single qubit fundamentally different from a classical coin spinning in the air?Why is the state of multiple qubits given by their tensor product?Notation for two entangled registersA question about notation for quantum statesA two qubit state in a special formConcurrence for a two qubit state
Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff
Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
What to do with post with dry rot?
I'm thinking of a number
Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients
How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Slither Like a Snake
Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
How many spell slots should a Fighter 11/Ranger 9 have?
How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?
Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Notation for two qubit composite product state
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Compute average value of two-qubit systemWhat can I deduce about $f(x)$ if $f$ is balanced or constant?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How do I show that a two-qubit state is an entangled state?How is a single qubit fundamentally different from a classical coin spinning in the air?Why is the state of multiple qubits given by their tensor product?Notation for two entangled registersA question about notation for quantum statesA two qubit state in a special formConcurrence for a two qubit state
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $beginpmatrix 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $beginpmatrix 1 \ 0\0\0 endpmatrix$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $beginpmatrix 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $beginpmatrix 1 \ 0\0\0 endpmatrix$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $beginpmatrix 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $beginpmatrix 1 \ 0\0\0 endpmatrix$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $beginpmatrix 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endpmatrix$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $beginpmatrix 1 \ 0\0\0 endpmatrix$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,66641556
6,66641556
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
can'tcauchycan'tcauchy
1135
1135
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $beginbmatrix 1 \ 0 endbmatrix otimes beginbmatrix 1 \ 0endbmatrix $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
$10rangle = beginbmatrix 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 endbmatrix, $
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
$01rangle = beginbmatrix 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, $
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5911%2fnotation-for-two-qubit-composite-product-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $beginbmatrix 1 \ 0 endbmatrix otimes beginbmatrix 1 \ 0endbmatrix $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
$10rangle = beginbmatrix 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 endbmatrix, $
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
$01rangle = beginbmatrix 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, $
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $beginbmatrix 1 \ 0 endbmatrix otimes beginbmatrix 1 \ 0endbmatrix $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
$10rangle = beginbmatrix 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 endbmatrix, $
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
$01rangle = beginbmatrix 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, $
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $beginbmatrix 1 \ 0 endbmatrix otimes beginbmatrix 1 \ 0endbmatrix $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
$10rangle = beginbmatrix 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 endbmatrix, $
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
$01rangle = beginbmatrix 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, $
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $beginbmatrix 1 \ 0 endbmatrix otimes beginbmatrix 1 \ 0endbmatrix $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
$10rangle = beginbmatrix 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 endbmatrix, $
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
$01rangle = beginbmatrix 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, $
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦Sanchayan Dutta
6,66641556
6,66641556
add a comment |
add a comment |
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5911%2fnotation-for-two-qubit-composite-product-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown